Capacitated Fair-Range Clustering: Hardness and Approximation Algorithms
Ameet Gadekar, Suhas Thejaswi Muniyappa
Abstract
Capacitated fair-range k-clustering generalizes classical k-clustering by incorporating both capacity constraints and demographic fairness. In this setting, data points are categorized as clients and facilities, where each facility has a capacity limit and may belong to one or more possibly intersecting demographic groups. The task is to select k facilities as centers and assign each client to a center such that: (a) no center exceeds its capacity, (b) the number of centers selected from each group lies within specified lower and upper bounds-defining the fair-range constraints, and (c) the clustering cost-e.g., k-median or k-means-is minimized. Prior work by Thejaswi et al. (KDD 2022) showed that even satisfying fairrange constraints is NP-hard, thereby making the problem inapproximable to any polynomial factor. We strengthen this result by showing that inapproximability persists even when the fair-range constraints are trivially satisfiable, highlighting the intrinsic computational complexity of the clustering task itself. Assuming standard complexity-theoretic conjectures, we further show that no non-trivial approximation is possible without exhaustively enumerating all k-subsets of the facility set. Notably, our inapproximability results hold even on tree metrics and even when the number of groups is logarithmic in the size of the facility set. In light of these strong inapproximability results, we focus our attention to a more practical setting where the number of groups is constant. In this regime, we design two approximation algorithms: (i) a polynomial-time O(log k)and O(log 2 k)-approximation algorithm for the k-median and k-means objectives, and (ii) a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized by k, achieving (3 + ϵ)and (9 + ϵ)-approximation, respectively. These results match the best-known approximation guarantees for capacitated clustering without fair-range constraints and resolves an open question posed by Zang et al. (NeurIPS 2024).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0fe9b946-cc8c-4572-ad9a-9517afdbd714Builds on10
- Fair k-Centers via Maximum MatchingMatthew Jones, Huy L. Nguyen, Thy Dinh NguyenICML 2020 · 63 citations
- Approximation Algorithms for Fair Range ClusteringSèdjro Salomon Hotegni, Sepideh Mahabadi, Ali VakilianICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Parameterized Approximation Algorithms for Sum of Radii Clustering and VariantsXianrun Chen, Dachuan Xu, Yicheng Xu, Yong ZhangAAAI 2024 · 17 citations
- Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Fair-Range ClusteringZhen Zhang, Xiaohong Chen, Limei Liu, Jie Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Clustering with General Norm ObjectivesFateme Abbasi, Sandip Banerjee, Jaroslaw Byrka, Parinya Chalermsook et al.FOCS 2023 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Doubly Constrained Fair ClusteringJohn P. Dickerson, Seyed A. Esmaeili, Jamie H. Morgenstern, Claire Jie ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- Clustering with Fair-Center Representation: Parameterized Approximation Algorithms and HeuristicsSuhas Thejaswi, Ameet Gadekar, Bruno Ordozgoiti, Michal OsadnikKDD 2022 · 7 citations
- Fair Clustering for Data Summarization: Improved Approximation Algorithms and Complexity InsightsAmeet Gadekar, Aristides Gionis, Suhas ThejaswiWWW 2025 · 7 citations
- Fair Clustering Under a Bounded CostSeyed A. Esmaeili, Brian Brubach, Aravind Srinivasan, John DickersonNeurIPS 2021 · 36 citations
- Fast and Accurate Fair k-Center Clustering in Doubling MetricsMatteo Ceccarello, Andrea Pietracaprina, Geppino PucciWWW 2024 · 10 citations
