Floating-Point Neural Networks Can Represent Almost All Floating-Point Functions
Geonho Hwang, Yeachan Park, Wonyeol Lee, Sejun Park
Abstract
Existing works on the expressive power of neural networks typically assume real-valued parameters and exact mathematical operations during the evaluation of networks. However, neural networks run on actual computers can take parameters only from a small subset of the reals and perform inexact mathematical operations with round-off errors and overflows. In this work, we study the expressive power of floating-point neural networks, i.e., networks with floating-point parameters and operations. We first observe that for floating-point neural networks to represent all functions from floating-point vectors to floating-point vectors, it is necessary to distinguish different inputs: the first layer of a network should be able to generate different outputs for different inputs. We also prove that such distinguishability is sufficient, along with mild conditions on activation functions. Our result shows that with practical activation functions, floating-point neural networks can represent floating-point functions from a wide domain to all finite or infinite floats. For example, the domain is all finite floats for Sigmoid and tanh, and it is all finite floats of magnitude less than 1/8 times the largest float for ReLU, ELU, SeLU, GELU, Swish, Mish and sin.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- On Expressive Power of Floating-Point TransformersSejun Park, Yeachan Park, Geonho HwangICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Floating-Point Neural Networks are Provably Robust Universal ApproximatorsGeonho Hwang, Wonyeol Lee, Yeachan Park, Sejun Park et al.CAV 2025
- On Minimum Depth and Width of Floating-Point Neural Networks for Representing Floating-Point FunctionsSejun Park, Yeachan Park, Geonho HwangICML 2026
- Floating-Point Networks with Automatic Differentiation Can Represent Almost All Floating-Point Functions and Their GradientsSejun Park, Yeachan Park, Geonho HwangICML 2026
Builds on9
- Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation FunctionsVincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,008 citations
- Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?Chulhee Yun, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICLR 2020 · 481 citations
- Minimum Width for Universal ApproximationSejun Park, Chulhee Yun, Jaeho Lee, Jinwoo ShinICLR 2021 · 148 citations
- Universal approximation power of deep residual neural networks via nonlinear control theoryPaulo Tabuada, Bahman GharesifardICLR 2021 · 31 citations
- Depth-Width Trade-offs for ReLU Networks via Sharkovsky's TheoremVaggos Chatziafratis, Sai Ganesh Nagarajan, Ioannis Panageas, Xiao WangICLR 2020 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Rational Neural Networks have Expressivity AdvantagesMaosen Tang, Alex TownsendICML 2026 · 1 citation
- On the Correctness of Automatic Differentiation for Neural Networks with Machine-Representable ParametersWonyeol Lee, Sejun Park, Alex AikenICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Separation Power of Equivariant Neural NetworksMarco Pacini, Xiaowen Dong, Bruno Lepri, Gabriele SantinICLR 2025
- Graph Neural Networks and Arithmetic CircuitsTimon Barlag, Vivian Holzapfel, Laura Strieker, Jonni Virtema et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Fractional Adaptive Linear UnitsJulio Zamora, Anthony D. Rhodes, Lama NachmanAAAI 2022 · 10 citations
