Learning Interpretable Temporal Properties from Positive Examples Only
Rajarshi Roy, Jean-Raphaël Gaglione, Nasim Baharisangari, Daniel Neider, Zhe Xu, Ufuk Topcu
Abstract
We consider the problem of explaining the temporal behavior of black-box systems using human-interpretable models. Following recent research trends, we rely on the fundamental yet interpretable models of deterministic finite automata (DFAs) and linear temporal logic (LTL_f) formulas. In contrast to most existing works for learning DFAs and LTL_f formulas, we consider learning from only positive examples. Our motivation is that negative examples are generally difficult to observe, in particular, from black-box systems. To learn meaningful models from positive examples only, we design algorithms that rely on conciseness and language minimality of models as regularizers. Our learning algorithms are based on two approaches: a symbolic and a counterexample-guided one. The symbolic approach exploits an efficient encoding of language minimality as a constraint satisfaction problem, whereas the counterexample-guided one relies on generating suitable negative examples to guide the learning. Both approaches provide us with effective algorithms with minimality guarantees on the learned models. To assess the effectiveness of our algorithms, we evaluate them on a few practical case studies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0f6b4de6-52de-4154-bc65-3ee107b612cfCited by top-tier papers5
- Learning Branching-Time Properties in CTL and ATL via Constraint SolvingBenjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, Rajarshi RoyFM 2024 · 4 citations
- Constrained LTL Specification Learning from ExamplesChangjian Zhang, Parv Kapoor, Ian Dardik, Leyi Cui et al.ICSE 2025 · 4 citations
- NADA: Neural Acceptance-Driven Approximate Specification MiningWeilin Luo, Tingchen Han, Junming Qiu, Hai Wan et al.ISSTA 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning DFAs from Positive Examples Only via Word CountingBenjamin Bordais, Daniel NeiderAAAI 2026
- Active Learning of Symbolic Automata over Rational NumbersSebastián Hagedorn Gaete, Martín Muñoz, Cristian Riveros, Rodrigo Toro IcarteAAAI 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- Generating Counterfactual Explanations Under Temporal ConstraintsAndrei Buliga, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Chiara Ghidini, Marco Montali et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with LTL and ω-Regular Objectives via Optimality-Preserving Translation to Average RewardsXuan-Bach Le, Dominik Wagner, Leon Witzman, Alexander Rabinovich et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- STL: Still Tricky Logic (for System Validation, Even When Showing Your Work)Isabelle Hurley, Rohan Paleja, Ashley Suh, Jaime Daniel Peña et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- On-the-fly Synthesis for LTL over Finite TracesShengping Xiao, Jianwen Li, Shufang Zhu, Yingying Shi et al.AAAI 2021 · 23 citations
- Autonomous Capability Assessment of Sequential Decision-Making Systems in Stochastic SettingsPulkit Verma, Rushang Karia, Siddharth SrivastavaNeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
