How Time Pressure in Different Phases of Decision-Making Influences Human-AI Collaboration
Shiye Cao, Catalina Gómez Caballero, Chien-Ming Huang
Abstract
Human cognitive and decision-making abilities depreciate under pressure, motivating the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) systems as decision support tools to assist people in performing tasks under stress. In this work, we study human decision-making behavior and task performance under time pressure---induced from limitedinitial observation time (time to perform the task before providing an initial response without AI input) andfinal decision time (time to weigh an AI's suggestion before reaching a collective human-AI team answer)---for spatial reasoning and count estimation tasks. Our results show that, while the impact of initial observation time on AI-assisted decision-making was dependent on task nature, participants were more likely to follow AI suggestions when they were provided with longer final decision time; moreover, although participants generally tended to adhere to their initial responses, they had more agency when they were more logically engaged in a task. Our results offer a nuanced understanding of human-AI collaboration under time pressure in different phases of the decision-making process.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 0f53cad8-0034-499f-8934-cdd2e60dd372Cited by top-tier papers12
- Designing for Appropriate Reliance: The Roles of AI Uncertainty Presentation, Initial User Decision, and User Demographics in AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShiye Cao, Anqi Liu, Chien-Ming HuangCSCW 2024 · 38 citations
- Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial ExplanationsSander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, Niels van BerkelCSCW 2025 · 32 citations
- Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making SkillsZana Buçinca, Siddharth Swaroop, Amanda E. Paluch, Finale Doshi-Velez et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
- Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing ProcessMohi Reza, Jeb Thomas-Mitchell, Peter Dushniku, Nathan Laundry et al.CSCW 2025 · 29 citations
- Do People Appropriately Rely on AI-Advice? An Analytical Review of HCI Research on Human-AI Decision-MakingMuhammad Raees, Vassilis-Javed Khan, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Konstantinos PapangelisCHI 2026 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Understanding User Reliance on AI in Assisted Decision-MakingShiye Cao, Chien-Ming HuangCSCW 2022 · 68 citations
- Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingCharvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney et al.CSCW 2022 · 184 citations
- Does More Advice Help? The Effects of Second Opinions in AI-Assisted Decision MakingZhuoran Lu, Dakuo Wang, Ming YinCSCW 2024 · 36 citations
- Guided Reflection in AI-Assisted Decision-Making: Effects on AI Overreliance and Decision AccuracyShanshan Li, Jingwei Li, Huiran Li, Hongwei Zhu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Will You Accept the AI Recommendation? Predicting Human Behavior in AI-Assisted Decision MakingXinru Wang, Zhuoran Lu, Ming YinWWW 2022 · 58 citations
