On the Existence of Seedless Condensers: Exploring the Terrain
Eshan Chattopadhyay, Mohit Gurumukhani, Noam Ringach
Abstract
While the existence of randomness extractors, both seeded and seedless, has been studied for many sources of randomness, currently, not much is known regarding the existence of seedless condensers in many settings. Here, we prove several new results for seedless condensers in the context of three related classes of sources: Non-Oblivious Symbol Fixing (NOSF) sources, online NOSF (oNOSF) sources (originally defined as SHELA sources in [1]), and almost Chor-Goldreich (CG) sources as defined in [2]. We will think of these sources as a sequence of random variablesonsymbols where at leastout of thesesymbols are “good” (i.e., have some min-entropy requirement), denoted as a, and the remaining “bad”symbols may adversarially depend on thesegood blocks. The difference between each of these sources is realized by restrictions on the power of the adversary, with the adversary in NOSF sources having no restrictions. Prior to our work, the only known seedless condenser upper or lower bound in these settings is due to [2], where they explicitly construct a seedless condenser for a restricted subset ofCG sources. The following are our main results concerning seedless condensers for each of these sources. 1) oNOSF sources a) When, we prove that condensing with error 0.99 above rateis impossible. In fact, we show that this is tight. b) Quite surprisingly, for, we show the existence of excellent condensers for uniform oNOSF sources. In addition, we show the existence of similar condensers for oNOSF sources with only logarithmic min-entropy. Our results are based on a new type of two-source extractors, called output-light two-source extractors, that we introduce and prove the existence of. 2) Adversarial CG sources a) We observe that uniform adversarial CG sources are equivalent to uniform oNOSF sources and consequently inherit the same results. b) We show that one cannot condense beyond the min-entropy gap of each block or condense low min-entropy CG sources above rate 1/2. 3) NOSF sources a) We show that condensing with constant error above rateis impossible for uniform NOSF sources for anyand, thus ruling out the possibility of any non-trivial condensing. This shows an interesting distinction between NOSF and oNOSF sources.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- Extractors: Low Entropy Requirements Colliding with Non-malleabilityDivesh Aggarwal, Eldon Chung, Maciej ObremskiCRYPTO 2023 · 1 citation
- Extractors for Samplable Distributions with Polynomially Small Min-EntropyRonen ShaltielFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Extractors for Samplable Distributions with Low Min-EntropyMarshall Ball, Ronen Shaltiel, Jad SilbakSTOC 2025 · 5 citations
- Leakage-Resilient Extractors against Number-on-Forehead ProtocolsEshan Chattopadhyay, Jesse GoodmanSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Improved Computational Extractors and Their ApplicationsDakshita Khurana, Akshayaram SrinivasanCRYPTO 2021 · 1 citation
