The Effects of System Interpretation Errors on Learning New Input Mechanisms
Kevin C. Lam, Carl Gutwin, Madison Klarkowski, Andy Cockburn
Abstract
Input mechanisms can produce noisy signals that computers must interpret, and this interpretation can misconstrue the user’s intention. Researchers have studied how interpretation errors can affect users’ task performance, but little is known about how these errors affect learning, and whether they help or hinder the transition to expertise. Previous findings suggest that increasing the user’s attention can facilitate learning, so frequent interpretation errors may increase attention and learning; alternatively, however, interpretation errors may negatively interfere with skill development. To explore these potentially important effects, we conducted studies where participants learned commands with various rates of artificially injected interpretation errors. Our results showed that higher rates of interpretation error led to worse memory retention, higher completion times, higher occurrences of user error (beyond those injected by the system), and greater perceived effort. These findings indicate that when input mechanisms must interpret the user’s input, interpretation errors cause problems for user learning.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 0edb52c9-dc36-4d8b-a207-798edbfe756eRelated papers
- More Errors vs. Longer Commands: The Effects of Repetition and Reduced Expressiveness on Input Interpretation Error, Learning, and EffortKevin C. Lam, Carl Gutwin, Madison Klarkowski, Andy CockburnCHI 2022 · 1 citation
- On Designing Programming Error Messages for Novices: Readability and its Constituent FactorsPaul Denny, James Prather, Brett A. Becker, Catherine Mooney et al.CHI 2021 · 59 citations
- Can Voice Assistants Be Microaggressors? Cross-Race Psychological Responses to Failures of Automatic Speech RecognitionKimi Wenzel, Nitya Devireddy, Cam Davidson, Geoff KaufmanCHI 2023 · 24 citations
- Interpretability Gone Bad: The Role of Bounded Rationality in How Practitioners Understand Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Matthew R. Conrad, Davis Rule, Cliff Lampe et al.CSCW 2024 · 14 citations
- Impact of Model Interpretability and Outcome Feedback on Trust in AIDaehwan Ahn, Abdullah Almaatouq, Monisha Gulabani, Kartik HosanagarCHI 2024 · 33 citations
