Sample Complexity of Agnostic Multiclass Classification: Natarajan Dimension Strikes Back
Alon Cohen, Liad Erez, Steve Hanneke, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Qian Zhang
Abstract
The fundamental theorem of statistical learning establishes that binary PAC learning is governed by a single parameter—the Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension—which controls both learnability and sample complexity. Extending this characterization to multiclass classification has long been challenging, since the early work of Natarajan in the late 80’s that proposed the Natarajan dimension (Nat) as a natural analogue of the VC dimension. Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz (2014) introduced the DS dimension, later shown by Brukhim et al. (2022) to characterize multiclass learnability. Brukhim et al. (2022) also demonstrated that the Natarajan and DS dimensions can diverge arbitrarily, so that multiclass learning appears to be governed by DS rather than Nat. We show that the agnostic multiclass PAC sample complexity is in fact governed by two distinct dimensions. Specifically, we prove nearly tight agnostic sample complexity bounds that, up to logarithmic factors, take the form DS1.5 / є + Nat / є2 where є is the excess risk. This bound is tight up to a √DS factor in the first lower-order term, nearly matching known Nat/є2 and DS/є lower bounds. The first term reflects the DS-controlled regime, while the second reveals that the Natarajan dimension still dictates asymptotic behavior for small є. Thus, unlike in binary or online classification—where a single dimension (VC or Littlestone) controls both phenomena—multiclass learning inherently involves two structural parameters. Our technical approach departs significantly from traditional agnostic learning methods based on uniform convergence or reductions-to-realizable techniques. A key ingredient is a novel online procedure, based on a self-adaptive multiplicative-weights algorithm which performs a label-space reduction. This approach may be of independent interest and find further applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0e632d48-432b-4ea5-a999-ecefb784b7c8Builds on8
- Optimal Learners for Realizable Regression: PAC Learning and Online LearningIdan Attias, Steve Hanneke, Alkis Kalavasis, Amin Karbasi et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 33 citations
- A Characterization of List LearnabilityMoses Charikar, Chirag PabbarajuSTOC 2023 · 25 citations
- A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept ClassesNoga Alon, Steve Hanneke, Ron Holzman, Shay MoranFOCS 2021 · 11 citations
- Improved Sample Complexity for Multiclass PAC LearningSteve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Qian ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Agnostic Active Learning Is Always Better Than Passive LearningSteve HannekeNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
Related papers
- A Characterization of Multiclass LearnabilityNataly Brukhim, Daniel Carmon, Irit Dinur, Shay Moran et al.FOCS 2022 · 7 citations
- On Learnability and Disambiguation of Multiclass Partial Concept ClassesJingyuan Xu, Xin Zou, Xiuwen Gong, Weiwei LiuICML 2026 · 2 citations
- On Robust Multiclass LearnabilityJingyuan Xu, Weiwei LiuNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC LearningSatchit Sivakumar, Mark Bun, Marco GaboardiNeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations
- Fast Rates for Bandit PAC Multiclass ClassificationLiad Erez, Alon Peled-Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
