A Semantic-based Optimization Approach for Repairing LLMs: Case Study on Code Generation
Jian Gu, Aldeida Aleti, Chunyang Chen, Hongyu Zhang
Abstract
Language Models (LMs) are widely used in software engineering for code generation, but they may produce erroneous code. Rather than repairing outputs, a more thorough remedy is to address underlying model failures. LM repair offers a lightweight solution: it requires minimal data, lowers computational cost, and limits side effects. Unlike full retraining, LM repair focuses on applying tailored updates to targeted neurons, making it suitable for limited resources, high-performance demands, or strict safety requirements. In this paper, we propose Semantic Targeting for Analytical Repair (STAR), a novel semantic-based optimization method for repairing LLMs. STAR realizes the main operations of repairing LMs in an optimization process, including locating “buggy neurons”, solving “neuron patches”, and patching “buggy neurons”. The neuron patches are computed with a solid semantic-based analytical formula, which directly bridges the changes to logits with the deltas of neurons, by steering latent representations. Compared to the prior work of LM repair (MINT) and standard optimization methods (SGD), STAR integrates their strengths while mitigating their limitations. By reformulating LM repair as an optimization process, STAR may solve multiple failures together, significantly improving the usefulness. Evaluated on coding tasks using popular code LMs, STAR demonstrates superior effectiveness compared with the state-of-the-art. For instance, on CoNaLa, STAR obtained 10.5%–19.9% improvements in ExactMatch score. Besides, STAR exhibits better efficiency, achieving an average of 2.4–7.0 times speedup in solving each model failure. In terms of side effects, namely the balance between generalization and specificity, STAR outperforms prior work by a significant margin. Additionally, we conducted assessments on the overfitting risk of LM repair as well as the cumulative impact. Further, we analyzed the differences with pipeline-based methods and explained the reason why STAR is better and how it mitigated the common limitations of LM repair.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0ddc09b7-25c5-47d5-95e3-9771b3ee1bf9Builds on21
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- On the Effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-TuningZihao Fu, Haoran Yang, Anthony Man-Cho So, Wai Lam et al.AAAI 2023 · 234 citations
- PMET: Precise Model Editing in a TransformerXiaopeng Li, Shasha Li, Shezheng Song, Jing Yang et al.AAAI 2024 · 208 citations
- Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?Yilun Zhou, Serena Booth, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Julie ShahAAAI 2022 · 167 citations
Related papers
- Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Yuxiang Wei, Lingming ZhangICSE 2023 · 321 citations
- An Empirical Study on Fine-Tuning Large Language Models of Code for Automated Program RepairKai Huang, Xiangxin Meng, Jian Zhang, Yang Liu et al.ASE 2023 · 91 citations
- Impact of Code Language Models on Automated Program RepairNan Jiang, Kevin Liu, Thibaud Lutellier, Lin TanICSE 2023 · 164 citations
- Template-Guided Program Repair in the Era of Large Language ModelsKai Huang, Jian Zhang, Xiangxin Meng, Yang LiuICSE 2025 · 7 citations
- Automated Repair of Programs from Large Language ModelsZhiyu Fan, Xiang Gao, Martin Mirchev, Abhik Roychoudhury et al.ICSE 2023 · 213 citations
