Aligning What Vision-Language Models See and Perceive with Adaptive Information Flow
Chengxin Liu, Wonseok Choi, Chenshuang Zhang, Tae-Hyun Oh
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capability in a wide range of tasks such as visual recognition, document parsing, and visual grounding. Nevertheless, recent work shows that while VLMs often manage to capture the correct image region corresponding to the question, they do not necessarily produce the correct answers. In this work, we demonstrate that this misalignment could be attributed to suboptimal information flow within VLMs, where text tokens distribute too much attention to irrelevant visual tokens, leading to incorrect answers. Based on the observation, we show that modulating the information flow during inference can improve the perception capability of VLMs. The idea is that text tokens should only be associated with important visual tokens during decoding, eliminating the interference of irrelevant regions. To achieve this, we propose a token dynamics-based method to determine the importance of visual tokens, where visual tokens that exhibit distinct activation patterns during different decoding stages are viewed as important. We apply our approach to representative open-source VLMs and evaluate on various datasets, including visual question answering, visual grounding and counting, optical character recognition, and object hallucination. The results show that our approach significantly improves the performance of baselines. Project page: https://cxliu0.github.io/AIF/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0d79fcab-b5b6-4bc1-aa99-5441f8aaaf48Builds on26
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,029 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- Teaching CLIP to Count to TenRoni Paiss, Ariel Ephrat, Omer Tov, Shiran Zada et al.ICCV 2023 · 196 citations
- Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMsShengbang Tong, Zhuang Liu, Yuexiang Zhai, Yi Ma et al.CVPR 2024 · 111 citations
Related papers
- What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language ModelsOmri Kaduri, Shai Bagon, Tali DekelCVPR 2025
- Through the Magnifying Glass: Adaptive Perception Magnification for Hallucination-Free VLM DecodingShunqi Mao, Chaoyi Zhang, Tom Weidong CaiACL 2026 · 10 citations
- Capturing Gaze Shifts for Guidance: Cross-Modal Fusion Enhancement for VLM Hallucination MitigationZheng Qi, Chao Shang, Evangelia Spiliopoulou, Nikolaos PappasICML 2026
- Devils in Middle Layers of Large Vision-Language Models: Interpreting, Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Attention LensZhangqi Jiang, Junkai Chen, Beier Zhu, Tingjin Luo et al.CVPR 2025
- IF-Prune: Information-Flow Guided Token Pruning for Efficient Vision-Language ModelsGuohao Sun, Yufei Wang, Sizhuo Ma, Yuege Xie et al.CVPR 2026
