An improved derandomization of the switching lemma
Zander Kelley
Abstract
We prove a new derandomization of Håstad's switching lemma, showing how to efficiently generate restrictions satisfying the switching lemma for DNF or CNF formulas of size m using only O(log m) random bits. Derandomizations of the switching lemma have been useful in many works as a key building-block for constructing objects which are in some way provablypseudorandom with respect to AC 0 -circuits (e.g., [AW85, TX13, GW14, SS16, AS17, ST17, ST19, BDSG + 18, DHH19, Tel19]).
Here, we use our new derandomization to give an improved analysis of the pseudorandom generator of Trevisan and Xue for AC 0 -circuits (CCC'13): we show that the generator ε-fools size-m, depth-D circuits with n-bit inputs using only O(log(m/ε) D • log n) random bits. In particular, we obtain (modulo the log log-factors hidden in the O-notation) a dependence on m/ε which is best-possible with respect to currently-known AC 0 -circuit lower bounds.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0d4acb76-d0e8-47b3-8e4e-9ed7d0345b32Builds on2
Related papers
- Fooling Constant-Depth Threshold Circuits (Extended Abstract)Pooya Hatami, William M. Hoza, Avishay Tal, Roei TellFOCS 2021 · 4 citations
- Depth-d Threshold Circuits vs. Depth-(d+1) AND-OR TreesPooya Hatami, William M. Hoza, Avishay Tal, Roei TellSTOC 2023 · 2 citations
- Strong average-case lower bounds from non-trivial derandomizationLijie Chen, Hanlin RenSTOC 2020 · 14 citations
- Sharp threshold results for computational complexityLijie Chen, Ce Jin, R. Ryan WilliamsSTOC 2020 · 2 citations
- Cell-Probe Lower Bounds via Semi-Random CSP Refutation: Simplified and the Odd-Locality CaseVenkatesan Guruswami, Xin Lyu, Weiqiang YuanSODA 2026
