USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
How to Cover up Anomalous Accesses to Electronic Health Records
Xiaojun Xu, Qingying Hao, Zhuolin Yang, Bo Li, David M. Liebovitz, Gang Wang, Carl A. Gunter
Abstract
Illegitimate access detection systems in hospital logs perform post hoc detection instead of runtime access restriction to allow widespread access in emergencies. We study the effectiveness of adversarial machine learning strategies against such detection systems on a large-scale dataset consisting of a year of access logs at a major hospital. We study a range of graph-based anomaly detection systems, including heuristicbased and Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based models. We find that evasion attacks, in which covering accesses (that is, accesses made to disguise a target access) are injected during evaluation period of the target access, can successfully fool the detection system. We also show that such evasion attacks can transfer among different detection algorithms. On the other hand, we find that poisoning attacks, in which adversaries inject covering accesses during the training phase of the model, do not effectively mislead the trained detection system unless the attacker is given unrealistic capabilities such as injecting over 10,000 accesses or imposing a high weight on the covering accesses in the training algorithm. To examine the generalizability of the results, we also apply our attack against a state-of-the-art detection model on the LANL network lateral movement dataset, and observe similar conclusions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0cc2114b-97b7-4b51-ae19-215b3efdabfbCited by top-tier papers3
- Understanding and Bridging the Gap Between Unsupervised Network Representation Learning and Security AnalyticsJiacen Xu, Xiaokui Shu, Zhou LiS&P 2024 · 14 citations
- Entente: Cross-silo Intrusion Detection on Network Log Graphs with Federated LearningJiacen Xu, Chenang Li, Yu Zheng, Zhou LiNDSS 2026 · 3 citations
- A First-Principles Evaluation of Graph-Based Network Intrusion Detection SystemsRui Zhao, Wajih UI HassanCCS 2026
Builds on4
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- EvolveGCN: Evolving Graph Convolutional Networks for Dynamic GraphsAldo Pareja, Giacomo Domeniconi, Jie Chen, Tengfei Ma et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,429 citations
- Log2vec: A Heterogeneous Graph Embedding Based Approach for Detecting Cyber Threats within EnterpriseFucheng Liu, Yu Wen, Dongxue Zhang, Xihe Jiang et al.CCS 2019 · 314 citations
- Euler: Detecting Network Lateral Movement via Scalable Temporal Graph Link PredictionIsaiah J. King, H. Howie HuangNDSS 2022
Related papers
- Sometimes, You Aren't What You Do: Mimicry Attacks against Provenance Graph Host Intrusion Detection SystemsAkul Goyal, Xueyuan Han, Gang Wang, Adam BatesNDSS 2023
- BinarizedAttack: Structural Poisoning Attacks to Graph-based Anomaly DetectionYulin Zhu, Yuni Lai, Kaifa Zhao, Xiapu Luo et al.ICDE 2022 · 26 citations
- Grimm: A Plug-and-Play Perturbation Rectifier for Graph Neural Networks Defending Against Poisoning AttacksAo Liu, Wenshan Li, Beibei Li, Wengang Ma et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Detecting Structurally Anomalous Logins Within Enterprise NetworksHossein Siadati, Nasir D. MemonCCS 2017 · 44 citations
- Multi-Instance Adversarial Attack on GNN-Based Malicious Domain DetectionMahmoud Nazzal, Issa Khalil, Abdallah Khreishah, NhatHai Phan et al.S&P 2024 · 9 citations
