Harnessing Negative Signals: Reinforcement Distillation from Teacher Data for LLM Reasoning
Shuyao Xu, Cheng Peng, Jiangxuan Long, Weidi Xu, Wei Chu, Yuan Qi
Abstract
Recent advances in model distillation show that data from advanced reasoning models can effectively train smaller student models. However, standard practices discard incorrect reasoning traces -- valuable, yet underutilized data. This paper addresses the critical question: How can both positive and negative distilled reasoning traces be effectively leveraged to maximize LLM reasoning performance in an offline setting? We employ a two-stage training recipe: first, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on positive traces, followed by a refinement stage using both positive and negative traces. We find that a simple REINFORCE-style objective, which we term the Reinforcement Distillation (REDI) objective, outperforms established preference optimization methods like DPO and SimPO in this distillation context. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Notably, our Qwen-REDI-1.5B model, trained on just 131k traces from the open Open-R1 dataset, achieves an 83.1% score on MATH-500. Its performance matches that of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, a model trained on 800k proprietary data. This result showcases the remarkable data efficiency of utilizing previously discarded negative traces.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0cbc5259-2ffa-4db6-9038-7697c65bf213Cited by top-tier papers2
- MARD: Module-Aware Reasoning Distillation for Language Models with Adaptive SupervisionWenqi Yang, Jianjun Li, Zhibo Zhang, Mingqian Ding et al.ACL 2026
- From Imitation to Discrimination: Toward a Generalized Curriculum Advantage Mechanism Enhancing Cross-Domain Reasoning TasksChangpeng Yang, Jinyang Wu, Yuchen Liu, Shuai Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on10
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Learning to Reason under Off-Policy GuidanceJianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Zican Hu, Zhi Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 310 citations
- Iterative Reasoning Preference OptimizationRichard Yuanzhe Pang, Weizhe Yuan, He He, Kyunghyun Cho et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 287 citations
Related papers
- The Quality-Utility Paradox: Why High-Reward Data Impairs Small Model Mathematical ReasoningHaolong Qian, Xianliang Yang, Ma yinuo, Lirong Che et al.ICML 2026
- AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement LearningYang Chen, Zhuolin Yang, Zihan Liu, Chankyu Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language ModelsSiyan Zhao, Zhihui Xie, Mengchen Liu, Jing Huang et al.ICML 2026 · 245 citations
- Making Expert Reasoning Learnable with Self-DistillationEthan Mendes, Jungsoo Park, Alan RitterICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Where Did This Sentence Come From? Tracing Provenance in LLM Reasoning DistillationKaiyuan Liu, Shaotian Yan, Rui Miao, Bing Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
