Seeing is Believing: Exploring Perceptual Differences in DeepFake Videos
Rashid Tahir, Brishna Batool, Hira Jamshed, Mahnoor Jameel, Mubashir Anwar, Faizan Ahmed, Muhammad Adeel Zaffar, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar
Abstract
With AI on the boom, DeepFakes have emerged as a tool with a massive potential for abuse. The hyper-realistic imagery of these manipulated videos coupled with the expedited delivery models of social media platforms gives deception, propaganda, and disinformation an entirely new meaning. Hence, raising awareness about DeepFakes and how to accurately flag them has become imperative. However, given differences in human cognition and perception, this is not straightforward. In this paper, we perform an investigative user study and also analyze existing AI detection algorithms from the literature to demystify the unknowns that are at play behind the scenes when detecting DeepFakes. Based on our findings, we design a customized training program to improve detection and evaluate on a treatment group of low-literate population, which is most vulnerable to DeepFakes. Our results suggest that, while DeepFakes are becoming imperceptible, contextualized education and training can help raise awareness and improve detection.
• Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0cb36b66-4696-424a-8aa8-c8aa1a907b77Cited by top-tier papers8
- Are Deepfakes Concerning? Analyzing Conversations of Deepfakes on Reddit and Exploring Societal ImplicationsDilrukshi Gamage, Piyush Ghasiya, Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Mark E. Whiting et al.CHI 2022 · 77 citations
- "It Matches My Worldview": Examining Perceptions and Attitudes Around Fake VideosFarhana Shahid, Srujana Kamath, Annie Sidotam, Vivian Jiang et al.CHI 2022 · 38 citations
- It's Trying Too Hard To Look Real: Deepfake Moderation Mistakes and Identity-Based BiasJaron Mink, Miranda Wei, Collins W. Munyendo, Kurt Hugenberg et al.CHI 2024 · 10 citations
- Effect of AI Performance, Risk Perception, and Trust on Human Dependence in Deepfake Detection AI SystemYingfan Zhou, Ester Chen, Manasa Pisipati, Aiping Xiong et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos DetectionChen Chen, Dion GohCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on3
- FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial ImagesAndreas Rössler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,966 citations
- Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANTero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten et al.CVPR 2020
- Celeb-DF: A Large-Scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake ForensicsYuezun Li, Xin Yang, Pu Sun, Honggang Qi et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- DeepPhish: Understanding User Trust Towards Artificially Generated Profiles in Online Social NetworksJaron Mink, Licheng Luo, Natã M. Barbosa, Olivia Figueira et al.USENIX Security 2022
- "Better Be Computer or I'm Dumb": A Large-Scale Evaluation of Humans as Audio Deepfake DetectorsKevin Warren, Tyler Tucker, Anna Crowder, Daniel Olszewski et al.CCS 2024 · 9 citations
- Beyond the Naked Eye: Empirical Study of How People Perceive, Detect, and Respond to AI-Manipulated VideosKaniz Fatima, Y. Kelly Wu, Ersin UzunCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Blind and Low-Vision Individuals' Detection of Audio DeepfakesFilipo Sharevski, Aziz Zeidieh, Jennifer Vander Loop, Peter JachimCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Hear Us, then Protect Us: Navigating Deepfake Scams and Safeguard Interventions with Older Adults through Participatory DesignYuxiang Zhai, Xiao Xue, Zekai Guo, Tongtong Jin et al.CHI 2025 · 16 citations
