Lune

SIGIR2020Top-tier venue

Agreement and Disagreement between True and False-Positive Metrics in Recommender Systems Evaluation

Elisa Mena-Maldonado, Rocío Cañamares, Pablo Castells, Yongli Ren, Mark Sanderson

2020Year
16Citations

Abstract

False-positive metrics can capture an important side of recommendation quality, focusing on the impact of suggestions that are disliked by users, as a complement of common metrics that only measure the amount of successful recommendations. In this paper we research the extent to which false-positive metrics agree or disagree with true-positive metrics in the offline evaluation of recommender systems. We discover a surprising degree of systematic disagreement that was occasionally noted but not explained in the literature by previous authors. We find an explanation for the discrepancy be-tween the metrics in the effect of popularity biases, which impact false and true-positive metrics in very different ways: instead of rewarding the recommendation of popular items, as with true-positive, false-positive metrics penalize the popular. We determine precise conditions and cases in the general trends, with a formal explanation for our findings, which we confirm and illustrate empirically in experiments with different datasets.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 0c8b5460-7f20-47d9-90bf-f2d2a4829a9a

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines