Switched Flow Matching: Eliminating Singularities via Switching ODEs
Qunxi Zhu, Wei Lin
Abstract
Continuous-time generative models, such as Flow Matching (FM), construct probability paths to transport between one distribution and another through the simulation-free learning of the neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs). During inference, however, the learned model often requires multiple neural network evaluations to accurately integrate the flow, resulting in a slow sampling speed. We attribute the reason to the inherent (joint) heterogeneity of source and/or target distributions, namely the singularity problem, which poses challenges for training the neural ODEs effectively. To address this issue, we propose a more general framework, termed Switched FM (SFM), that eliminates singularities via switching ODEs, as opposed to using a uniform ODE in FM. Importantly, we theoretically show that FM cannot transport between two simple distributions due to the existence and uniqueness of initial value problems of ODEs, while these limitations can be well tackled by SFM. From an orthogonal perspective, our framework can seamlessly integrate with the existing advanced techniques, such as minibatch optimal transport, to further enhance the straightness of the flow, yielding a more efficient sampling process with reduced costs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the newly proposed SFM through several numerical examples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0c305e2c-b74d-47fc-9960-8cafa781ad04Cited by top-tier papers2
- Delay Flow MatchingBolin Zhao, Xiaoyu Zhang, Yuting Dong, Xin Lu et al.ICLR 2026
- Diversified Flow Matching with Translation IdentifiabilitySagar Shrestha, Xiao FuICML 2025
Builds on16
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
Related papers
- Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch CouplingsAram-Alexandre Pooladian, Heli Ben-Hamu, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Brandon Amos et al.ICML 2023 · 243 citations
- Minimizing Trajectory Curvature of ODE-based Generative ModelsSangyun Lee, Beomsu Kim, Jong Chul YeICML 2023 · 84 citations
- Flow Matching for Generative ModelingYaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel et al.ICLR 2023 · 87 citations
- Optimal Flow Matching: Learning Straight Trajectories in Just One StepNikita Kornilov, Petr Mokrov, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Alexander KorotinNeurIPS 2024 · 93 citations
- Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise CouplingAram Davtyan, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Volkan Cevher, Paolo FavaroICLR 2025
