Can Implicit Bias Explain Generalization? Stochastic Convex Optimization as a Case Study
Assaf Dauber, Meir Feder, Tomer Koren, Roi Livni
Abstract
The notion of implicit bias, or implicit regularization, has been suggested as a means to explain the surprising generalization ability of modern-days overparameterized learning algorithms. This notion refers to the tendency of the optimization algorithm towards a certain structured solution that often generalizes well. Recently, several papers have studied implicit regularization and were able to identify this phenomenon in various scenarios. We revisit this paradigm in arguably the simplest non-trivial setup, and study the implicit bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in the context of Stochastic Convex Optimization. As a first step, we provide a simple construction that rules out the existence of a distribution-independent implicit regularizer that governs the generalization ability of SGD. We then demonstrate a learning problem that rules out a very general class of distribution-dependent implicit regularizers from explaining generalization, which includes strongly convex regularizers as well as non-degenerate norm-based regularizations. Certain aspects of our constructions point out to significant difficulties in providing a comprehensive explanation of an algorithm's generalization performance by solely arguing about its implicit regularization properties.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b8046b5-6724-4ff0-8d32-40d65a101276Cited by top-tier papers11
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by NormsNoam Razin, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for GeneralizationJonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, Phillip Pope, Michael Moeller et al.ICLR 2022 · 83 citations
- The Benefits of Implicit Regularization from SGD in Least Squares ProblemsDifan Zou, Jingfeng Wu, Vladimir Braverman, Quanquan Gu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 41 citations
- SGD: The Role of Implicit Regularization, Batch-size and Multiple-epochsAyush Sekhari, Karthik Sridharan, Satyen KaleNeurIPS 2021 · 36 citations
- On Convergence and Generalization of Dropout TrainingPoorya Mianjy, Raman AroraNeurIPS 2020 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Implicit Bias of (Stochastic) Gradient Descent for Rank-1 Linear Neural NetworkBochen Lyu, Zhanxing ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent or the Architecture: Disentangling the Effects of Overparameterization of Neural NetworksAmit Peleg, Matthias HeinICML 2024
- Conflicting Biases at the Edge of Stability: Norm versus Sharpness RegularizationMaria Matveev, Vit Fojtik, Hung-Hsu Chou, Gitta Kutyniok et al.ICML 2026
- Implicit Regularization or Implicit Conditioning? Exact Risk Trajectories of SGD in High DimensionsCourtney Paquette, Elliot Paquette, Ben Adlam, Jeffrey PenningtonNeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Benign Underfitting of Stochastic Gradient DescentTomer Koren, Roi Livni, Yishay Mansour, Uri ShermanNeurIPS 2022 · 26 citations
