PACE: Pacing Operator Learning to Accurate Optical Field Simulation for Complicated Photonic Devices
Hanqing Zhu, Wenyan Cong, Guojin Chen, Shupeng Ning, Ray T. Chen, Jiaqi Gu, David Z. Pan
Abstract
Electromagnetic field simulation is central to designing, optimizing, and validating photonic devices and circuits. However, costly computation associated with numerical simulation poses a significant bottleneck, hindering scalability and turnaround time in the photonic circuit design process. Neural operators offer a promising alternative, but existing SOTA approaches, NeurOLight, struggle with predicting high-fidelity fields for real-world complicated photonic devices, with the best reported 0.38 normalized mean absolute error in NeurOLight. The inter-plays of highly complex light-matter interaction, e.g., scattering and resonance, sensitivity to local structure details, non-uniform learning complexity for full-domain simulation, and rich frequency information, contribute to the failure of existing neural PDE solvers. In this work, we boost the prediction fidelity to an unprecedented level for simulating complex photonic devices with a novel operator design driven by the above challenges. We propose a novel cross-axis factorized PACE operator with a strong long-distance modeling capacity to connect the full-domain complex field pattern with local device structures. Inspired by human learning, we further divide and conquer the simulation task for extremely hard cases into two progressively easy tasks, with a first-stage model learning an initial solution refined by a second model. On various complicated photonic device benchmarks, we demonstrate one sole PACE model is capable of achieving 73% lower error with 50% fewer parameters compared with various recent ML for PDE solvers. The two-stage setup further advances high-fidelity simulation for even more intricate cases. In terms of runtime, PACE demonstrates 154-577x and 11.8-12x simulation speedup over numerical solver using scipy or highly-optimized pardiso solver, respectively. We open sourced the code and dataset.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on12
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- On Layer Normalization in the Transformer ArchitectureRuibin Xiong, Yunchang Yang, Di He, Kai Zheng et al.ICML 2020 · 1,388 citations
- Choose a Transformer: Fourier or GalerkinShuhao CaoNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential EquationsGaurav Gupta, Xiongye Xiao, Paul BogdanNeurIPS 2021 · 355 citations
- Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEsBogdan Raonic, Roberto Molinaro, Tim De Ryck, Tobias Rohner et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 292 citations
Related papers
- NeurOLight: A Physics-Agnostic Neural Operator Enabling Parametric Photonic Device SimulationJiaqi Gu, Zhengqi Gao, Chenghao Feng, Hanqing Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- DeepOHeat: Operator Learning-based Ultra-fast Thermal Simulation in 3D-IC DesignZiyue Liu, Yixing Li, Jing Hu, Xinling Yu et al.DAC 2023 · 50 citations
- Factorized Fourier Neural OperatorsAlasdair Tran, Alexander Patrick Mathews, Lexing Xie, Cheng Soon OngICLR 2023 · 56 citations
- Nonparametric Boundary Geometry in Physics Informed Deep LearningScott Alexander Cameron, Arnu Pretorius, Stephen J. RobertsNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Latent Neural Operator for Solving Forward and Inverse PDE ProblemsTian Wang, Chuang WangNeurIPS 2024 · 104 citations
