Deferred Poisoning: Making the Model More Vulnerable via Hessian Singularization
Yuhao He, Jinyu Tian, Xianwei Zheng, Li Dong, Yuanman Li, Jiantao Zhou
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that deep learning models are very vulnerable to poisoning attacks. Many defense methods have been proposed to address this issue. However, traditional poisoning attacks are not as threatening as commonly believed. This is because they often cause differences in how the model performs on the training set compared to the validation set. Such inconsistency can alert defenders that their data has been poisoned, allowing them to take the necessary defensive actions. In this paper, we introduce a more threatening type of poisoning attack called the Deferred Poisoning Attack. This new attack allows the model to function normally during the training and validation phases but makes it very sensitive to evasion attacks or even natural noise. We achieve this by ensuring the poisoned model's loss function has a similar value as a normally trained model at each input sample but with a large local curvature. A similar model loss ensures that there is no obvious inconsistency between the training and validation accuracy, demonstrating high stealthiness. On the other hand, the large curvature implies that a small perturbation may cause a significant increase in model loss, leading to substantial performance degradation, which reflects a worse robustness. We fulfill this purpose by making the model have singular Hessian information at the optimal point via our proposed Singularization Regularization term. We have conducted both theoretical and empirical analyses of the proposed method and validated its effectiveness through experiments on image classification tasks. Furthermore, we have confirmed the hazards of this form of poisoning attack under more general scenarios using natural noise, offering a new perspective for research in the field of security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- Adversarial Examples Make Strong PoisonsLiam Fowl, Micah Goldblum, Ping-yeh Chiang, Jonas Geiping et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 185 citations
- Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial TrainingLue Tao, Lei Feng, Jinfeng Yi, Sheng-Jun Huang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 90 citations
- Autoregressive Perturbations for Data PoisoningPedro Sandoval Segura, Vasu Singla, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 62 citations
Related papers
- DEFEAT: Deep Hidden Feature Backdoor Attacks by Imperceptible Perturbation and Latent Representation ConstraintsZhendong Zhao, Xiaojun Chen, Yuexin Xuan, Ye Dong et al.CVPR 2022 · 72 citations
- Safety-Efficacy Trade Off: Robustness against Data-PoisoningDiego Granziol, Ulugbek AbdimanabovICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient MatchingJonas Geiping, Liam H. Fowl, W. Ronny Huang, Wojciech Czaja et al.ICLR 2021 · 268 citations
- Beating Backdoor Attack at Its Own GameMin Liu, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Xiangyu YueICCV 2023 · 19 citations
- CLPA: Clean-Label Poisoning Availability Attacks Using Generative Adversarial NetsBingyin Zhao, Yingjie LaoAAAI 2022 · 31 citations
