Linguistic representations for fewer-shot relation extraction across domains
Sireesh Gururaja, Ritam Dutt, Tinglong Liao, Carolyn P. Rosé
Abstract
Recent work has demonstrated the positive impact of incorporating linguistic representations as additional context and scaffolding on the in-domain performance of several NLP tasks. We extend this work by exploring the impact of linguistic representations on cross-domain performance in a few-shot transfer setting. An important question is whether linguistic representations enhance generalizability by providing features that function as cross-domain pivots. We focus on the task of relation extraction on three datasets of procedural text in two domains, cooking and materials science. Our approach augments a popular transformerbased architecture by alternately incorporating syntactic and semantic graphs constructed by freely available off-the-shelf tools. We examine their utility for enhancing generalization, and investigate whether earlier findings, e.g. that semantic representations can be more helpful than syntactic ones, extend to relation extraction in multiple domains. We find that while the inclusion of these graphs results in significantly higher performance in few-shot transfer, both types of graph exhibit roughly equivalent utility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0a0b39c1-9974-49e2-988e-a7b985486f56Cited by top-tier papers2
- A Survey of AMR ApplicationsShira Wein, Juri OpitzEMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- Leveraging Machine-Generated Rationales to Facilitate Social Meaning Detection in ConversationsRitam Dutt, Zhen Wu, Jiaxin Shi, Divyanshu Sheth et al.ACL 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on5
- One SPRING to Rule Them Both: Symmetric AMR Semantic Parsing and Generation without a Complex PipelineMichele Bevilacqua, Rexhina Blloshmi, Roberto NavigliAAAI 2021 · 197 citations
- Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation ExtractionHao Peng, Tianyu Gao, Xu Han, Yankai Lin et al.EMNLP 2020 · 185 citations
- Few-shot Relation Extraction via Bayesian Meta-learning on Relation GraphsMeng Qu, Tianyu Gao, Louis-Pascal A. C. Xhonneux, Jian TangICML 2020 · 131 citations
- Semantic Representation for Dialogue ModelingXuefeng Bai, Yulong Chen, Linfeng Song, Yue ZhangACL 2021
- Fine-grained Information Extraction from Biomedical Literature based on Knowledge-enriched Abstract Meaning RepresentationZixuan Zhang, Nikolaus Nova Parulian, Heng Ji, Ahmed Elsayed et al.ACL 2021
Related papers
- Knowledge-Enhanced Domain Adaptation in Few-Shot Relation ClassificationJiawen Zhang, Jiaqi Zhu, Yi Yang, Wandong Shi et al.KDD 2021 · 17 citations
- Decoupling Representation and Knowledge for Few-Shot Intent Classification and Slot FillingJie Han, Yixiong Zou, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Synergistic Anchored Contrastive Pre-training for Few-Shot Relation ExtractionDa Luo, Yanglei Gan, Rui Hou, Run Lin et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Structured Semantic Information Helps Retrieve Better Examples for In-Context Learning Applied to Few-Shot Relation ExtractionAunabil Chakma, Mihai Surdeanu, Eduardo BlancoACL 2026 · 1 citation
- GiLT: Augmenting Transformer Language Models with Dependency GraphsTianyu Huang, Yida Zhao, Chuyan Zhou, Kewei TuACL 2026
