ACL Findings2026
Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation
Sondos Mahmoud Bsharat, Zhiqiang Shen
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning when guided by chain-of-thought exemplars, yet collecting large, high-quality reasoning datasets remains laborious and resource-intensive. We introduce Prompting Test-Time Scaling (P-TTS), a prompt-space data augmentation framework for enhancing LLM reasoning via fine-tuning. In P-TTS, scaling refers to systematic expansion of the prompt space during offline teacher-data generation, not to increased inference-time compute for the deployed student. Rather than collecting thousands of examples, P-TTS starts from a small pool of 90 manually selected reasoning instances and applies principled instruction templates and paraphrased prompt variants to elicit diverse reasoning trajectories from a teacher model, producing a compact synthetic training set. We fine-tune Qwen-2.5 models of multiple sizes on the resulting data. On reasoning benchmarks including AIME25, MATH500, and GPQA-Diamond, P-TTS consistently improves accuracy over competitive small-data baselines such as S1 and S1.1 (1Kshot), with the largest gains on AIME25 while remaining strong on MATH500 and GPQA-Diamond. P-TTS also improves generalization on out-of-domain reasoning evaluations. Ablations show that exemplar diversity and promptspace scaling are critical drivers of improvement, suggesting that prompt scaling explores the latent space of reasoning patterns, amplifying LLM problem-solving with minimal annotation overhead. P-TTS offers a practical, low-cost way to elicit strong LLM reasoning in resource-constrained or rapidly evolving domains. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/VILA-Lab/PTTS.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 637 citations
- OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning ModelsEtash Kumar Guha, Ryan Marten, Sedrick Keh, Negin Raoof et al.ICLR 2026 · 235 citations
Related papers
- Scaling Prompt Synthesis for Large Language Model ReasoningXueliang Zhao, Wei Wu, Jian Guan, Zhuocheng Gong et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-TuningZhiyuan Fan, Guanqiao Chen, Yanyi Huang, Mingkuan Zhao et al.ACL 2026
- Large Language Models Can Self-ImproveJiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 184 citations
- Scaling Code-Assisted Chain-of-Thoughts and Instructions for Model ReasoningHonglin Lin, Qizhi Pei, Zhuoshi Pan, Yu Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Large Language Models Are Reasoning TeachersNamgyu Ho, Laura Schmid, Se-Young YunACL 2023 · 102 citations
