Post-Collusion Security and Distance Bounding
Sjouke Mauw, Zach Smith, Jorge Toro-Pozo, Rolando Trujillo-Rasua
Abstract
Verification of cryptographic protocols is traditionally built upon the assumption that participants have not revealed their long-term keys. However, in some cases, participants might collude to defeat some security goals, without revealing their long-term secrets. We develop a model based on multiset rewriting to reason about collusion in security protocols. We introduce the notion of postcollusion security, which verifies security properties claimed in sessions initiated after collusion occurred. We use post-collusion security to analyse terrorist fraud on protocols for securing physical proximity, known as distance-bounding protocols. In a terrorist fraud attack, agents collude to falsely prove proximity, whilst no further false proximity proof can be issued without further collusion. Our definitions and the Tamarin prover are used to develop a modular framework for verification of distance-bounding protocols that accounts for all types of attack from literature. We perform a survey of over 25 protocols, which include industrial protocols such as Mastercard's contactless payment PayPass and NXP's MIFARE Plus with proximity check. For the industrial protocols we confirm attacks, propose fixes, and deliver computer-verifiable security proofs of the repaired versions. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Security protocols; Formal security models; Logic and verification; Mobile and wireless security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- The EMV Standard: Break, Fix, VerifyDavid A. Basin, Ralf Sasse, Jorge Toro-PozoS&P 2021 · 69 citations
- Practical EMV Relay ProtectionAndreea-Ina Radu, Tom Chothia, Christopher J. P. Newton, Ioana Boureanu et al.S&P 2022 · 26 citations
- Hash Gone Bad: Automated discovery of protocol attacks that exploit hash function weaknessesVincent Cheval, Cas Cremers, Alexander Dax, Lucca Hirschi et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Formal Analysis and Patching of BLE-SC PairingMin Shi, Jing Chen, Kun He, Haoran Zhao et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Secret State Leakage Attacks and Their Impacts on EMV Contactless Payment AppsJesse Chen, Rubin Yuchan Yang, Ahmad Musa, Syed Rafiul Hussain et al.S&P 2026
Builds on5
- A Formal Analysis of 5G AuthenticationDavid A. Basin, Jannik Dreier, Lucca Hirschi, Sasa Radomirovic et al.CCS 2018 · 428 citations
- A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott et al.CCS 2017 · 247 citations
- On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security GuaranteesKatriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Luke Garratt, Jon Millican et al.CCS 2018 · 140 citations
- Distance-Bounding Protocols: Verification without Time and LocationSjouke Mauw, Zach Smith, Jorge Toro-Pozo, Rolando Trujillo-RasuaS&P 2018 · 58 citations
- Modelling and Analysis of a Hierarchy of Distance Bounding AttacksTom Chothia, Joeri de Ruiter, Ben SmythUSENIX Security 2018 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Security Analysis and Implementation of Relay-Resistant Contactless PaymentsIoana Boureanu, Tom Chothia, Alexandre Debant, Stéphanie DelauneCCS 2020 · 10 citations
- Formal Analysis of Session-Handling in Secure Messaging: Lifting Security from Sessions to ConversationsCas Cremers, Charlie Jacomme, Aurora NaskaUSENIX Security 2023
- A Sound Translation from Tamarin to ProVerif: Enabling Comparative AnalysisKevin Morio, Yavor Ivanov, Robert KünnemannCCS 2026
- Extrapolating Formal Analysis to Uncover Attacks in Bluetooth Passkey Entry PairingMohit Kumar Jangid, Yue Zhang, Zhiqiang LinNDSS 2023
- Keeping Up with the KEMs: Stronger Security Notions for KEMs and Automated Analysis of KEM-based ProtocolsCas Cremers, Alexander Dax, Niklas MedingerCCS 2024 · 11 citations
