Exact Shape Correspondence via 2D graph convolution
Barakeel Fanseu Kamhoua, Lin Zhang, Yongqiang Chen, Han Yang, Kaili Ma, Bo Han, Bo Li, James Cheng
Abstract
For exact 3D shape correspondence (matching or alignment), i.e., the task of matching each point on a shape to its exact corresponding point on the other shape (or to be more specific, matching at geodesic error 0), most existing methods do not perform well due to two main problems. First, on nearly-isometric shapes (i.e., low noise levels), most existing methods use the eigen-vectors (eigen-functions) of the Laplace Beltrami Operator (LBO) or other shape descriptors to update an initialized correspondence which is not exact, leading to an accumulation of update errors. Thus, though the final correspondence may generally be smooth, it is generally inexact. Second, on non-isometric shapes (noisy shapes), existing methods are generally not robust to noise as they usually assume near-isometry. In addition, existing methods that attempt to address the non-isometric shape problem (e.g., GRAMPA) are generally computationally expensive and do not generalise to nearly-isometric shapes. To address these two problems, we propose a 2D graph convolution-based framework called 2D-GEM. 2D-GEM is robust to noise on non-isometric shapes and with a few additional constraints, it also addresses the errors in the update on nearly-isometric shapes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of 2D-GEM by achieving a high accuracy of 90.5 % at geodesic error 0 on the non-isometric benchmark SHREC16, i.e., TOPKIDS (while being much faster than GRAMPA), and on nearly-isometric benchmarks by achieving a high accuracy of 92.5 % on TOSCA and 84.9 % on SCAPE at geodesic error 0.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 08b7ba6e-924a-4e62-969c-b00601439d46Cited by top-tier papers4
- Does Invariant Graph Learning via Environment Augmentation Learn Invariance?Yongqiang Chen, Yatao Bian, Kaiwen Zhou, Binghui Xie et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 71 citations
- How Interpretable Are Interpretable Graph Neural Networks?Yongqiang Chen, Yatao Bian, Bo Han, James ChengICML 2024 · 17 citations
- HOPE: Shape Matching Via Aligning Different K-hop NeighbourhoodsBarakeel Fanseu Kamhoua, Huamin QuNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Higher-Order Ratio Cycles for Fast and Globally Optimal Shape MatchingPaul Roetzer, Viktoria Ehm, Daniel Cremers, Zorah Lähner et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on9
- Learning Combinatorial Embedding Networks for Deep Graph MatchingRunzhong Wang, Junchi Yan, Xiaokang YangICCV 2019 · 268 citations
- Deep Graph Matching ConsensusMatthias Fey, Jan Eric Lenssen, Christopher Morris, Jonathan Masci et al.ICLR 2020 · 227 citations
- Adaptive Network Alignment with Unsupervised and Multi-order Convolutional NetworksThanh Trung Huynh, Van Vinh Tong, Thanh Tam Nguyen, Hongzhi Yin et al.ICDE 2020 · 84 citations
- Deep Graphical Feature Learning for the Feature Matching ProblemZhen Zhang, Wee Sun LeeICCV 2019 · 67 citations
- Spectral Graph Matching and Regularized Quadratic Relaxations: Algorithm and TheoryZhou Fan, Cheng Mao, Yihong Wu, Jiaming XuICML 2020 · 58 citations
Related papers
- Unsupervised Learning of Robust Spectral Shape MatchingDongliang Cao, Paul Roetzer, Florian BernardSIGGRAPH 2023 · 45 citations
- Hybrid Functional Maps for Crease-Aware Non-Isometric Shape MatchingLennart Bastian, Yizheng Xie, Nassir Navab, Zorah LähnerCVPR 2024
- Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structured Shape MatchingJean-Michel Roufosse, Abhishek Sharma, Maks OvsjanikovICCV 2019 · 160 citations
- Deep Geometric Functional Maps: Robust Feature Learning for Shape CorrespondenceNicolas Donati, Abhishek Sharma, Maks OvsjanikovCVPR 2020
- An Elastic Basis for Spectral Shape CorrespondenceFlorine Hartwig, Josua Sassen, Omri Azencot, Martin Rumpf et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 21 citations
