Pluto: Sample Selection for Robust Anomaly Detection on Polluted Log Data
Lei Ma, Lei Cao, Peter M. VanNostrand, Dennis M. Hofmann, Yao Su, Elke A. Rundensteiner
Abstract
Log anomaly detection, critical in identifying system failures and preempting security breaches, finds irregular patterns within large volumes of log data. Modern log anomaly detectors rely on training deep learning models on clean anomaly-free log data. However, such clean log data requires expensive and tedious human labeling. In this paper, we thus propose a robust log anomaly detection framework, PlutoNOSPACE, that automatically selects a clean representative sample subset of the polluted log sequence data to train a Transformer-based anomaly detection model. Pluto features three innovations. First, due to localized concentrations of anomalies inherent in the embedding space of log data, Pluto partitions the sequence embedding space generated by the model into regions that then allow it to identify and discard regions that are highly polluted by our pollution level estimation scheme, based on our pollution quantification via Gaussian mixture modeling. Second, for the remaining more slightly polluted regions, we select samples that maximally purify the eigenvector spectrum, which can be transformed into the NP-hard facility location problem; allowing us to leverage its greedy solution with a (1-(1/e)) approximation guarantee in optimality. Third, by iteratively alternating between the above subset selection, a model re-training on the latest subset, and a subset filtering using dynamic training artifacts generated by the latest model, the data selected is progressively refined. The final sample set is used to retrain the final anomaly detection model. Our experiments on four real-world log benchmark datasets demonstrate that by retaining 77.7% (BGL) to 96.6% (ThunderBird) of the normal sequences while effectively removing 90.3% (BGL) to 100.0% (ThunderBird, HDFS) of the anomalies, Pluto provides a significant absolute F-1 improvement up to 68.86% (2.16% → 71.02%) compared to the state-of-the-art sample selection methods. The implementation of this work is available at https://github.com/LeiMa0324/Pluto-SIGMOD25.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- CoLA: Model Collaboration for Log-based Anomaly DetectionXuhang Zhu, Xiu Tang, Sai Wu, Jichen Li et al.VLDB 2025 · 2 citations
- Krone: Hierarchical and Modular Log Anomaly DetectionLei Ma, Jinyang Liu, Tieying Zhang, Peter M. VanNostrand et al.ICDE 2026
Builds on10
- DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs through Deep LearningMin Du, Feifei Li, Guineng Zheng, Vivek SrikumarCCS 2017 · 1,823 citations
- Log-based Anomaly Detection with Deep Learning: How Far Are We?Van-Hoang Le, Hongyu ZhangICSE 2022 · 212 citations
- FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy LabelsTaehyeon Kim, Jongwoo Ko, Sangwook Cho, Jinhwan Choi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
- A Topological Filter for Learning with Label NoisePengxiang Wu, Songzhu Zheng, Mayank Goswami, Dimitris N. Metaxas et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 143 citations
- Searching to Exploit Memorization Effect in Learning with Noisy LabelsQuanming Yao, Hansi Yang, Bo Han, Gang Niu et al.ICML 2020 · 121 citations
Related papers
- Semi-supervised Log-based Anomaly Detection via Probabilistic Label EstimationLin Yang, Junjie Chen, Zan Wang, Weijing Wang et al.ICSE 2021 · 216 citations
- MetaLog: Generalizable Cross-System Anomaly Detection from Logs with Meta-LearningChenyangguang Zhang, Tong Jia, Guopeng Shen, Pinyan Zhu et al.ICSE 2024 · 28 citations
- Log-based Anomaly Detection Without Log ParsingVan-Hoang Le, Hongyu ZhangASE 2021 · 249 citations
- A Critical Review of Common Log Data Sets Used for Evaluation of Sequence-Based Anomaly Detection TechniquesMax Landauer, Florian Skopik, Markus WurzenbergerFSE 2024 · 44 citations
- ADA: Adaptive Deep Log Anomaly DetectorYali Yuan, Sripriya Srikant Adhatarao, Mingkai Lin, Yachao Yuan et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 58 citations
