Linear Spherical Sliced Optimal Transport: A Fast Metric for Comparing Spherical Data
Xinran Liu, Yikun Bai, Rocio Diaz Martin, Kaiwen Shi, Ashkan Shahbazi, Bennett Allan Landman, Catie Chang, Soheil Kolouri
Abstract
Efficient comparison of spherical probability distributions becomes important in fields such as computer vision, geosciences, and medicine. Sliced optimal transport distances, such as spherical and stereographic spherical sliced Wasserstein distances, have recently been developed to address this need. These methods reduce the computational burden of optimal transport by slicing hyperspheres into onedimensional projections, i.e., lines or circles. Concurrently, linear optimal transport has been proposed to embed distributions into L 2 spaces, where the L 2 distance approximates the optimal transport distance, thereby simplifying comparisons across multiple distributions. In this work, we introduce the Linear Spherical Sliced Optimal Transport (LSSOT) framework, which utilizes slicing to embed spherical distributions into L 2 spaces while preserving their intrinsic geometry, offering a computationally efficient metric for spherical probability measures. We establish the metricity of LSSOT and demonstrate its superior computational efficiency in applications such as cortical surface registration, 3D point cloud interpolation via gradient flow, and shape embedding. Our results demonstrate the significant computational benefits and high accuracy of LSSOT in these applications. * Data used in preparation of this article were partially obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this paper. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: https://adni.loni.usc.edu/ wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf . Contributions. In summary, our contributions are as follows: 1. We propose Linear Spherical Sliced Optimal Transport (LSSOT) to embed spherical distributions into L 2 space while preserving their intrinsic spherical geometry. 2. We prove that LSSOT defines a metric, and demonstrate the superior computation efficiency over other baseline metrics. 3. We conduct a comprehensive set of experiments to show the effectiveness and efficiency of LSSOT in diverse applications, from point cloud analysis to cortical surface registration. BACKGROUND 2.1 CIRCULAR OPTIMAL TRANSPORT AND LINEAR CIRCULAR OPTIMAL TRANSPORT Consider two circular probability measures µ, ν ∈ P(S 1 ), where S 1 denotes the unit circle in R 2 . Let us parametrize S 1 with the angles in between 0 and 1 and consider the cost function c(x, y) := h(|x -y| S 1 ), where h : R → R + is a convex increasing function and |x -y| S 1 := min|x -y|, 1 -|x -y| for x, y ∈ [0, 1). The Circular Optimal Transport (COT) problem between µ and ν is defined by the following two equivalent minimization problems: where in the first expression Γ(µ, ν) is the set of all couplings between µ and ν, and in the second expression F µ (respectively, F ν ) is the cumulative distribution function of µ on S 1 (i.e., F µ (y) := µ([0, y)) = y 0 dµ, ∀y ∈ [0, 1)) extended on R by F µ (y + n) = F µ (y) + n, ∀y ∈ [0, 1), n ∈ Z, and its inverse (or quantile function) is defined by F -1 µ (y) = infx : F µ (x) > y. When h(x) = |x| p for 1 ≤ p < ∞, we denote COT h (•, •) as COT p (•, •), and COT p (•, •) 1/p defines a metric on P(S 1 ). Moreover, if µ = Unif(S 1 ) and h(x) = |x| 2 , the minimizer α µ,ν of (1) is the antipodal of E(ν), i.e.,
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 08997e52-b26a-4e44-97b0-3ae049a94e04Cited by top-tier papers2
- SOTAlign: Semi-Supervised Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models via Optimal TransportSimon Roschmann, Paul KRZAKALA, Sonia Mazelet, Quentin Bouniot et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Tree-sliced Sobolev IPMViet-Hoang Tran, Thanh Q. Tran, Thanh T. Chu, Duy-Tung Pham et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on4
- Optimal transport mapping via input convex neural networksAshok Vardhan Makkuva, Amirhossein Taghvaei, Sewoong Oh, Jason D. LeeICML 2020 · 254 citations
- Wasserstein Embedding for Graph LearningSoheil Kolouri, Navid NaderiAlizadeh, Gustavo K. Rohde, Heiko HoffmannICLR 2021 · 99 citations
- Validating Climate Models with Spherical Convolutional Wasserstein DistanceRobert C. Garrett, Trevor Harris, Zhuo Wang, Bo LiNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein DistancesHuy Tran, Yikun Bai, Abihith Kothapalli, Ashkan Shahbazi et al.ICML 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Spherical Tree-Sliced Wasserstein DistanceHoang V. Tran, Thanh T. Chu, Minh-Khoi Nguyen-Nhat, Huyen Trang Pham et al.ICLR 2025
- LCOT: Linear Circular Optimal TransportRocio Diaz Martin, Ivan Vladimir Medri, Yikun Bai, Xinran Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- Sliced Optimal Partial TransportYikun Bai, Bernhard Schmitzer, Matthew Thorpe, Soheil KolouriCVPR 2023
- Diffeomorphic Mesh Deformation via Efficient Optimal Transport for Cortical Surface ReconstructionThanh-Tung Le, Khai Nguyen, Shanlin Sun, Kun Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Streaming Sliced Optimal TransportKhai NguyenICML 2026
