GitChameleon 2.0: Evaluating AI Code Generation Against Python Library Version Incompatibilities
Diganta Misra, Nizar Islah, Victor May, Brice Rauby, Zihan Wang, Justine Gehring, Antonio Orvieto, Muawiz Sajjad Chaudhary, Eilif B. Muller, Irina Rish, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Massimo Caccia
Abstract
The rapid evolution of software libraries poses a considerable hurdle for code generation, necessitating continuous adaptation to frequent version updates while preserving backward compatibility. While existing code evolution benchmarks provide valuable insights, they typically lack execution-based evaluation for generating code compliant with specific library versions. To address this, we introduce GitChameleon 2.0, a novel, meticulously curated dataset comprising 328 Python code completion problems, each conditioned on specific library versions and accompanied by executable unit tests. GitChameleon 2.0 rigorously evaluates the capacity of contemporary large language models (LLMs), LLMpowered agents, code assistants, and RAG systems to perform version-conditioned code generation that demonstrates functional accuracy through execution. Our extensive evaluations indicate that state-of-the-art systems encounter significant challenges with this task; enterprise models achieving baseline success rates in the 48-51% range, underscoring the intricacy of the problem. By offering an execution-based benchmark emphasizing the dynamic nature of code libraries, GitChameleon 2.0 enables a clearer understanding of this challenge and helps guide the development of more adaptable and dependable AI code generation methods. 1 * *Equal contribution. Roles: Team Leads, Data and Core Contributors, Senior Advisors 1 GitChameleon 2.0 is the expanded successor to the original GitChameleon benchmark, increasing coverage from 116 to 328 Python code completion problems while preserving the same version-conditioned generation setting. Problem Statement Instruction: Write a custom_violinplot function that visualizes x and y from a Pandas DataFrame; scales the bandwidth to 1.5. Use the library Seaborn version 0.13.0. import seaborn as sns from matplotlib.axes import axes def custom_violinpolot(data: pd.DataFrame) -> Axes: return
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0877f2b7-ff8b-49ca-ba8c-452ee7107ea3Builds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-AwarenessTri Dao, Daniel Y. Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 5,493 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
Related papers
- TestGenEval: A Real World Unit Test Generation and Test Completion BenchmarkKush Jain, Gabriel Synnaeve, Baptiste RozièreICLR 2025
- DSCodeBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationShuyin Ouyang, Dong Huang, Jingwen Guo, Zeyu Sun et al.AAAI 2026 · 10 citations
- HumanEvo: An Evolution-Aware Benchmark for More Realistic Evaluation of Repository-Level Code GenerationDewu Zheng, Yanlin Wang, Ensheng Shi, Ruikai Zhang et al.ICSE 2025 · 2 citations
- Can Language Models Replace Programmers for Coding? REPOCOD Says 'Not Yet'Shanchao Liang, Nan Jiang, Yiran Hu, Lin TanACL 2025 · 9 citations
- LLMs Meet Library Evolution: Evaluating Deprecated API Usage in LLM-Based Code CompletionChong Wang, Kaifeng Huang, Jian Zhang, Yebo Feng et al.ICSE 2025 · 3 citations
