A Deeper Understanding of State-Based Critics in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Xueguang Lyu, Andrea Baisero, Yuchen Xiao, Christopher Amato
Abstract
Centralized Training for Decentralized Execution, where training is done in a centralized offline fashion, has become a popular solution paradigm in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Many such methods take the form of actor-critic with state-based critics, since centralized training allows access to the true system state, which can be useful during training despite not being available at execution time. State-based critics have become a common empirical choice, albeit one which has had limited theoretical justification or analysis. In this paper, we show that state-based critics can introduce bias in the policy gradient estimates, potentially undermining the asymptotic guarantees of the algorithm. We also show that, even if the state-based critics do not introduce any bias, they can still result in a larger gradient variance, contrary to the common intuition. Finally, we show the effects of the theories in practice by comparing different forms of centralized critics on a wide range of common benchmarks, and detail how various environmental properties are related to the effectiveness of different types of critics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 085e66ba-4b7e-48d7-85e6-ca772baadf16Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards a Standardised Performance Evaluation Protocol for Cooperative MARLRihab Gorsane, Omayma Mahjoub, Ruan de Kock, Roland Dubb et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- PMIC: Improving Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Progressive Mutual Information CollaborationPengyi Li, Hongyao Tang, Tianpei Yang, Xiaotian Hao et al.ICML 2022 · 49 citations
- Attention-Based Recurrence for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Stochastic Partial ObservabilityThomy Phan, Fabian Ritz, Philipp Altmann, Maximilian Zorn et al.ICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Provable Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Privileged InformationYang Cai, Xiangyu Liu, Argyris Oikonomou, Kaiqing ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 22 citations
Builds on4
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Shapley Q-Value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward GamesJianhong Wang, Yuan Zhang, Tae-Kyun Kim, Yunjie GuAAAI 2020 · 159 citations
- Learning Implicit Credit Assignment for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMeng Zhou, Ziyu Liu, Pengwei Sui, Yixuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 142 citations
- Value-Decomposition Multi-Agent Actor-CriticsJianyu Su, Stephen C. Adams, Peter A. BelingAAAI 2021 · 140 citations
Related papers
- Asynchronous Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYuchen Xiao, Weihao Tan, Christopher AmatoNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Communication-Efficient Actor-Critic Methods for Homogeneous Markov GamesDingyang Chen, Yile Li, Qi ZhangICLR 2022 · 11 citations
- Agent-Centric Actor-Critic for Asynchronous Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWhiyoung Jung, Sunghoon Hong, Deunsol Yoon, Kanghoon Lee et al.ICML 2025
- Difference Advantage Estimation for Multi-Agent Policy GradientsYueheng Li, Guangming Xie, Zongqing LuICML 2022 · 24 citations
- DOP: Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy GradientsYihan Wang, Beining Han, Tonghan Wang, Heng Dong et al.ICLR 2021 · 208 citations
