A General Recipe for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization
Jiaming Song, Lantao Yu, Willie Neiswanger, Stefano Ermon
Abstract
The acquisition function, a critical component in Bayesian optimization (BO), can often be written as the expectation of a utility function under a surrogate model. However, to ensure that acquisition functions are tractable to optimize, restrictions must be placed on the surrogate model and utility function. To extend BO to a broader class of models and utilities, we propose likelihood-free BO (LFBO), an approach based on likelihood-free inference. LFBO directly models the acquisition function without having to separately perform inference with a probabilistic surrogate model. We show that computing the acquisition function in LFBO can be reduced to optimizing a weighted classification problem, where the weights correspond to the utility being chosen. By choosing the utility function for expected improvement (EI), LFBO outperforms various state-of-the-art blackbox optimization methods on several real-world optimization problems. LFBO can also effectively leverage composite structures of the objective function, which further improves its regret by several orders of magnitude. * Equal contribution 1 NVIDIA (Work done while at Stanford).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 084a88ad-a2bc-493d-b7be-608b2c445183Cited by top-tier papers8
- DiscoBAX: Discovery of optimal intervention sets in genomic experiment designClare Lyle, Arash Mehrjou, Pascal Notin, Andrew Jesson et al.ICML 2023 · 16 citations
- Batch Bayesian optimisation via density-ratio estimation with guaranteesRafael Oliveira, Louis C. Tiao, Fabio T. RamosNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Generative Bayesian Optimization: Generative Models as Acquisition FunctionsRafael Oliveira, Daniel M. Steinberg, Edwin V. BonillaICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian OptimizationJiarong Pan, Stefan Falkner, Felix Berkenkamp, Joaquin VanschorenICML 2024 · 2 citations
- -PFN: Fast Entropy Search via In-Context LearningHerilalaina Rakotoarison, Steven Adriaensen, Tom Viering, Carl Hvarfner et al.ICML 2026
Builds on7
- NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture SearchXuanyi Dong, Yi YangICLR 2020 · 825 citations
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel SurrogatesMartin Wistuba, Josif GrabockaICLR 2021 · 87 citations
- Bayesian Optimization with High-Dimensional OutputsWesley J. Maddox, Maximilian Balandat, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Eytan BakshyNeurIPS 2021 · 75 citations
- Training Deep Energy-Based Models with f-Divergence MinimizationLantao Yu, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICML 2020 · 50 citations
Related papers
- BORE: Bayesian Optimization by Density-Ratio EstimationLouis C. Tiao, Aaron Klein, Matthias W. Seeger, Edwin V. Bonilla et al.ICML 2021 · 35 citations
- Bayesian Optimization over Discrete and Mixed Spaces via Probabilistic ReparameterizationSamuel Daulton, Xingchen Wan, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 71 citations
- Modulating Surrogates for Bayesian OptimizationErik Bodin, Markus Kaiser, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Zhenwen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 11 citations
- BO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian OptimizationCarl Hvarfner, Danny Stoll, Artur L. F. Souza, Marius Lindauer et al.ICLR 2022 · 93 citations
- Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic EntropiesWillie Neiswanger, Lantao Yu, Shengjia Zhao, Chenlin Meng et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
