Dichotomy of Control: Separating What You Can Control from What You Cannot
Sherry Yang, Dale Schuurmans, Pieter Abbeel, Ofir Nachum
Abstract
Future-or return-conditioned supervised learning is an emerging paradigm for offline reinforcement learning (RL), where the future outcome (i.e., return) associated with an observed action sequence is used as input to a policy trained to imitate those same actions. While return-conditioning is at the heart of popular algorithms such as decision transformer (DT), these methods tend to perform poorly in highly stochastic environments, where an occasional high return can arise from randomness in the environment rather than the actions themselves. Such situations can lead to a learned policy that is inconsistent with its conditioning inputs; i.e., using the policy to act in the environment, when conditioning on a specific desired return, leads to a distribution of real returns that is wildly different than desired. In this work, we propose the dichotomy of control (DoC), a future-conditioned supervised learning framework that separates mechanisms within a policy's control (actions) from those beyond a policy's control (environment stochasticity). We achieve this separation by conditioning the policy on a latent variable representation of the future, and designing a mutual information constraint that removes any information from the latent variable associated with randomness in the environment. Theoretically, we show that DoC yields policies that are consistent with their conditioning inputs, ensuring that conditioning a learned policy on a desired high-return future outcome will correctly induce high-return behavior. Empirically, we show that DoC is able to achieve significantly better performance than DT on environments that have highly stochastic rewards and transitions 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 080af4a3-1f99-4aa0-b4f4-cb07c8a1a96cCited by top-tier papers28
- Learning Interactive Real-World SimulatorsSherry Yang, Yilun Du, Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Jonathan Tompson et al.ICLR 2024 · 399 citations
- HIQL: Offline Goal-Conditioned RL with Latent States as ActionsSeohong Park, Dibya Ghosh, Benjamin Eysenbach, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2023 · 173 citations
- Supervised Pretraining Can Learn In-Context Reinforcement LearningJonathan Lee, Annie Xie, Aldo Pacchiano, Yash Chandak et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 170 citations
- When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?David Brandfonbrener, Alberto Bietti, Jacob Buckman, Romain Laroche et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 107 citations
- Optimal Goal-Reaching Reinforcement Learning via Quasimetric LearningTongzhou Wang, Antonio Torralba, Phillip Isola, Amy ZhangICML 2023 · 88 citations
Builds on15
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
- Multi-Game Decision TransformersKuang-Huei Lee, Ofir Nachum, Mengjiao Yang, Lisa Lee et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 279 citations
- RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?Scott Emmons, Benjamin Eysenbach, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 225 citations
Related papers
- Critic-Guided Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement LearningYuanfu Wang, Chao Yang, Ying Wen, Yu Liu et al.AAAI 2024 · 35 citations
- Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLTaku Yamagata, Ahmed Khalil, Raúl Santos-RodríguezICML 2023 · 121 citations
- Future-conditioned Unsupervised Pretraining for Decision TransformerZhihui Xie, Zichuan Lin, Deheng Ye, Qiang Fu et al.ICML 2023 · 32 citations
- You Can't Count on Luck: Why Decision Transformers and RvS Fail in Stochastic EnvironmentsKeiran Paster, Sheila A. McIlraith, Jimmy BaNeurIPS 2022 · 84 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Feature FusionTieru Wang, Kunbao Wu, Guoshun NanICLR 2026
