Short Leakage Resilient and Non-malleable Secret Sharing Schemes
Nishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi Sekar
Abstract
Leakage resilient secret sharing (LRSS) allows a dealer to share a secret amongst n parties such that any authorized subset of the parties can recover the secret from their shares, while an adversary that obtains shares of any unauthorized subset of parties along with bounded leakage from the other shares learns no information about the secret. Non-malleable secret sharing (NMSS) provides a guarantee that even shares that are tampered by an adversary will reconstruct to either the original message or something independent of it.
The most important parameter of LRSS and NMSS schemes is the size of each share. For LRSS, in the local leakage model (i.e., when the leakage functions on each share are independent of each other and bounded), Srinivasan and Vasudevan (CRYPTO 2019), gave a scheme for threshold access structures with share size of approximately (3•message length +μ), where μ is the number of bits of leakage tolerated from every share. For the case of NMSS, the best known result (again due to the above work) has share size of (11 • message length).
In this work, we build LRSS and NMSS schemes with much improved share size. Additionally, our LRSS scheme obtains optimal share and leakage size. In particular, we get the following results:
-We build an information-theoretic LRSS scheme for threshold access structures with a share size of (message length + μ). -As an application of the above result, we obtain an NMSS with a share size of (4•message length). Further, for the special case of sharing random messages, we obtain a share size of (2 • message length).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 07cacf93-1f88-48d3-aa74-6115e8c2b775Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Leakage-Resilience of the Shamir Secret-Sharing Scheme Against Physical-Bit LeakagesHemanta K. Maji, Hai H. Nguyen, Anat Paskin-Cherniavsky, Tom Suad et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 27 citations
- Lower Bounds for Leakage-Resilient Secret SharingJesper Buus Nielsen, Mark SimkinEUROCRYPT 2020 · 27 citations
- Constructing Locally Leakage-Resilient Linear Secret-Sharing SchemesHemanta K. Maji, Anat Paskin-Cherniavsky, Tom Suad, Mingyuan WangCRYPTO 2021 · 18 citations
- Extractors and Secret Sharing Against Bounded Collusion ProtocolsEshan Chattopadhyay, Jesse Goodman, Vipul Goyal, Ashutosh Kumar et al.FOCS 2020 · 18 citations
- Non-malleable Secret Sharing Against Bounded Joint-Tampering Attacks in the Plain ModelGianluca Brian, Antonio Faonio, Maciej Obremski, Mark Simkin et al.CRYPTO 2020 · 17 citations
Related papers
- New Bounds on the Local Leakage Resilience of Shamir's Secret Sharing SchemeOhad Klein, Ilan KomargodskiCRYPTO 2023 · 15 citations
- Adaptive Extractors and Their Application to Leakage Resilient Secret SharingNishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi SekarCRYPTO 2021 · 7 citations
- Quadratic Secret Sharing and Conditional Disclosure of SecretsAmos Beimel, Hussien Othman, Naty PeterCRYPTO 2021 · 6 citations
- Fully Anonymous Secret SharingAllison Bishop, Matthew Green, Yuval Ishai, Abhishek Jain et al.CRYPTO 2025 · 4 citations
- Better secret sharing via robust conditional disclosure of secretsBenny Applebaum, Amos Beimel, Oded Nir, Naty PeterSTOC 2020 · 1 citation
