Continual SFT Matches Multimodal RLHF with Negative Supervision
Ke Zhu, Yu Wang, Yanpeng Sun, Qiang Chen, Jiangjiang Liu, Gang Zhang, Jingdong Wang
Abstract
Multimodal RLHF usually happens after supervised finetuning (SFT) stage to continually improve vision-language models' (VLMs) comprehension. Conventional wisdom holds its superiority over continual SFT during this preference alignment stage. In this paper, we observe that the inherent value of multimodal RLHF lies in its negative supervision, the logit of the rejected responses. We thus propose a novel negative supervised finetuning (nSFT) approach that fully excavates these information resided. Our nSFT disentangles this negative supervision in RLHF paradigm, and continually aligns VLMs with a simple SFT loss. This is more memory efficient than multimodal RLHF where 2 (e.g., DPO) or 4 (e.g., PPO) large VLMs are strictly required. The effectiveness of nSFT is rigorously proved by comparing it with various multimodal RLHF approaches, across different dataset sources, base VLMs and evaluation metrics. Besides, fruitful of ablations are provided to support our hypothesis. Code will be found in https://github.com/Kevinz- code/nSFT/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 07b08584-622d-481c-9aae-91fba46f7570Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- NFT: Bridging Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning in Math ReasoningHuayu Chen, Kaiwen Zheng, Qinsheng Zhang, Ganqu Cui et al.ICLR 2026 · 31 citations
- Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Naturally Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Post-TrainingSong Lai, Haohan Zhao, Rong Feng, Changyi Ma et al.ICML 2026 · 46 citations
- SSL4RL: Revisiting Self-supervised Learning as Intrinsic Reward for Visual-Language ReasoningXiaojun Guo, Runyu Zhou, Yifei Wang, Qi Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Seeing is Solving: Unlocking Efficient Multimodal RL via View AlignmentQinsi Wang, Jing Shi, Kun Wan, Handong Zhao et al.ICML 2026
- Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference OptimizationShuo Xing, Peiran Li, Yuping Wang, Ruizheng Bai et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
