Processing and Acquisition Traces in Visual Encoders: What Does CLIP Know About Your Camera?
Ryan Ramos, Vladan Stojnic, Giorgos Kordopatis-Zilos, Yuta Nakashima, Giorgos Tolias, Noa Garcia
Abstract
Prior work has analyzed the robustness of visual encoders to image transformations and corruptions, particularly in cases where such alterations are not seen during training. When this occurs, they introduce a form of distribution shift at test time, often leading to performance degradation. The primary focus has been on severe corruptions that, when applied aggressively, distort useful signals necessary for accurate semantic predictions. We take a different perspective by analyzing parameters of the image acquisition process and transformations that may be subtle or even imperceptible to the human eye. We find that such parameters are systematically encoded in the learned visual representations and can be easily recovered. More strikingly, their presence can have a profound impact, either positively or negatively, on semantic predictions. This effect depends on whether there is a strong correlation or anti-correlation between semantic labels and these acquisition-based or processing-based labels. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/ryan-caesar-ramos/visual-encoder-traces
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0786d597-6ed7-4b42-be90-300a2d72c0d5Builds on37
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
Related papers
- Unexplored Faces of Robustness and Out-of-Distribution: Covariate Shifts in Environment and Sensor DomainsEunsu Baek, Keondo Park, Jiyoon Kim, Hyung-Sin KimCVPR 2024
- Dissecting Image CropsBasile Van Hoorick, Carl VondrickICCV 2021 · 9 citations
- Understanding and Improving Robustness of Vision Transformers through Patch-based Negative AugmentationYao Qin, Chiyuan Zhang, Ting Chen, Balaji Lakshminarayanan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 68 citations
- Grounding inductive biases in natural images: invariance stems from variations in dataDiane Bouchacourt, Mark Ibrahim, Ari S. MorcosNeurIPS 2021 · 32 citations
- Towards Causal VQA: Revealing and Reducing Spurious Correlations by Invariant and Covariant Semantic EditingVedika Agarwal, Rakshith Shetty, Mario FritzCVPR 2020
