Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflection
Yurun Yuan, Tengyang Xie
Abstract
Leveraging more test-time computation has proven to be an effective way to boost the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Among various methods, the verifyand-improve paradigm stands out for enabling dynamic solution exploration and feedback incorporation. However, existing approaches often suffer from restricted feedback spaces and lack of coordinated training of different parties, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this, we model this multi-turn refinement process as a Markov Decision Process and introduce DPSDP (Direct Policy Search by Dynamic Programming), a reinforcement learning algorithm that trains an actor-critic LLM system to iteratively refine answers via direct preference learning on self-generated data. Theoretically, DPSDP can match the performance of any policy within the training distribution. Empirically, we instantiate DPSDP with various base models and show improvements on both in-and out-ofdistribution benchmarks. For example, on benchmark MATH 500, majority voting over five refinement steps increases first-turn accuracy from 58.2% to 63.2% with Ministral-based models. An ablation study further confirms the benefits of multi-agent collaboration and out-of-distribution generalization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0732031d-df7b-4093-abc5-cca2c906b331Cited by top-tier papers4
- Unlocking the Power of Multi-Agent LLM for Reasoning: From Lazy Agents to DeliberationZhiwei Zhang, Xiaomin Li, Yudi Lin, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Are Reasoning LLMs Robust to Interventions on their Chain-of-Thought?Alexander von Recum, Leander Girrbach, Zeynep AkataICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- CyberJurors: A Multi-Agent Simulation Task for E-Commerce Disputes VerdictYanhui Sun, Wu Liu, Haifeng Ming, Xinru Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Paper Circle: An Open-source Multi-agent Research Discovery and Analysis FrameworkKomal Kumar, Aman Chadha, Salman Khan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on50
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- DRAFT-RL: Multi-Agent Chain-of-Draft Reasoning for Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced LLMsYuanhao Li, Mingshan Liu, Hongbo Wang, Yiding Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- Random Policy Valuation is Enough for LLM Reasoning with Verifiable RewardsHaoran He, Yuxiao Ye, Qingpeng Cai, Chen Hu et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Scaling Agentic Verifier for Competitive CodingZeyao Ma, Jing Zhang, Xiaokang Zhang, Jiaxi Yang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- AgentPO: Enhancing Multi-Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement LearningLin Sun, Chuang Liu, Can Zhang, Yubin Wu et al.ICLR 2026
