Pattern Matching under Weighted Edit Distance
Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Tomasz Kociumaka, Philip Wellnitz
Abstract
In Pattern Matching with Weighted Edits (PMwWE), we are given a pattern P of length m, a text T of length n, a positive threshold k, and oracle access to a weight function that specifies the costs of edits (depending on the involved characters, and normalized so that the cost of each edit is at least 1). The goal is to compute the starting positions of all fragments of T that can be obtained from P with edits of total cost at most k. PMwWE captures typical real-world applications more accurately than its unweighted variant (PMwE), where all edits have unit costs.Indeed, the textbook -time algorithm of Sellers [J. Algorithms'80], devised in the context of bioinformatics, already accounts for weights. Surprisingly, the understanding of PMWWE has not advanced in the last 45 years. In contrast, significant milestones for PMwE include an -time algorithm by Landau and Vishkin [STOC'86, J. Algorithms'89], an -time algorithm by Cole and Hariharan [SODA'98, SICOMP'02], and a recent -time solution by Charalampopoulos, Kociumaka, and Wellnitz [FOCS'22].In this work, we examine whether these results can be lifted to PMWWE even though (1) the underlying algorithms rely on combinatorial properties specific to the unweighted edit distance, and (2) under standard fine-grained complexity assumptions, computing the weighted edit distance is strictly harder than computing the unweighted edit distance [Cassis, Kociumaka, and Wellnitz; FOCS'23]. We obtain three main results:•a conceptually simple -time algorithm for PMWWE, very different from that of Landau and Vishkin;•a significantly more complicated time algorithm for PMWWE under the assumption that the weight function is a metric with integer values between 0 and W; and•an -time algorithm for PMWWE for the case of arbitrary weights. In the setting of metrics with small integer values, we nearly match the state of the art for PMwE where W=1.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 07177cd9-e4d8-4605-ae4e-2fd99b9924b0Builds on8
- Faster Pattern Matching under Edit Distance : A Reduction to Dynamic Puzzle Matching and the Seaweed Monoid of Permutation MatricesPanagiotis Charalampopoulos, Tomasz Kociumaka, Philip WellnitzFOCS 2022 · 8 citations
- Weighted Edit Distance Computation: Strings, Trees, and DyckDebarati Das, Jacob Gilbert, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Tomasz Kociumaka et al.STOC 2023 · 4 citations
- Optimal Algorithms for Bounded Weighted Edit DistanceAlejandro Cassis, Tomasz Kociumaka, Philip WellnitzFOCS 2023 · 4 citations
- Faster Approximate Pattern Matching: A Unified ApproachPanagiotis Charalampopoulos, Tomasz Kociumaka, Philip WellnitzFOCS 2020 · 2 citations
- On the Communication Complexity of Approximate Pattern MatchingTomasz Kociumaka, Jakob Nogler, Philip WellnitzSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Bounded Edit Distance: Optimal Static and Dynamic Algorithms for Small Integer WeightsEgor Gorbachev, Tomasz KociumakaSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Near-Optimal-Time Quantum Algorithms for Approximate Pattern MatchingTomasz Kociumaka, Jakob Nogler, Philip WellnitzSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Almost-optimal sublinear-time edit distance in the low distance regimeKarl Bringmann, Alejandro Cassis, Nick Fischer, Vasileios NakosSTOC 2022 · 4 citations
- Near-Optimal Property Testers for Pattern MatchingCe Jin, Tomasz KociumakaFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Small-space and streaming pattern matching with editsTomasz Kociumaka, Ely Porat, Tatiana StarikovskayaFOCS 2021 · 13 citations
