Scalable Verification of Zero-Knowledge Protocols
Miguel Isabel, Clara Rodríguez-Núñez, Albert Rubio
Abstract
The application of Zero-Knowledge (ZK) proofs is rapidly growing in the industry and has become a key element to enable privacy and enhance scalability in public distributed ledgers. In most practical ZK systems, the statement to be proven is expressed by means of a set of polynomial equations in a prime field that describe an arithmetic circuit. Describing general statements using this kind of constraints is a complex and error-prone task. This can be partly mitigated by using high-level programming languages, but at the cost of losing control over the added constraints and, as a result, obtaining too large systems for complex statements. In this context, having tools to automatically verify properties of the constraint systems is of paramount importance to guarantee the security of the protocol. However, since non-linear polynomial reasoning over a finite field is needed for checking challenging properties, existing automatic tools either do not scale or cannot detect non-trivial bugs. In this paper, we present a new scalable modular technique based on the application of transformation and deduction rules that have proven to be very effective in verifying properties over the signals of a circuit given as a set of polynomial equations in a large prime field. Our technique has been implemented in a tool called CIVER and applied to verify safety properties for circuits implemented in circom, which is one of the most popular languages for defining ZK protocols. We have been able to analyze large industrial circuits and detect subtle vulnerabilities in circuits designed by expert programmers.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 06c29cf4-c500-41e8-aa88-024ad5dc83fcCited by top-tier papers8
- SoK: What don't we know? Understanding Security Vulnerabilities in SNARKsStefanos Chaliasos, Jens Ernstberger, David Theodore, David Wong et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 32 citations
- zkFuzz: Foundation and Framework for Effective Fuzzing of Zero-Knowledge CircuitsHideaki Takahashi, Jihwan Kim, Suman Jana, Junfeng YangS&P 2026 · 8 citations
- ConsCS: Effective and Efficient Verification of Circom CircuitsJinan Jiang, Xinghao Peng, Jinzhao Chu, Xiapu LuoICSE 2025 · 2 citations
- Automated Verification of Consistency in Zero-Knowledge Proof CircuitsJon Stephens, Shankara Pailoor, Isil DilligCAV 2025 · 2 citations
- SoK: Understanding zk-SNARKs: The Gap Between Research and PracticeJunkai Liang, Daqi Hu, Pengfei Wu, Yunbo Yang et al.USENIX Security 2025
Related papers
- Certifying Zero-Knowledge Circuits with Refinement TypesJunrui Liu, Ian Kretz, Hanzhi Liu, Bryan Tan et al.S&P 2024 · 30 citations
- Automated Detection of Under-Constrained Circuits in Zero-Knowledge ProofsShankara Pailoor, Yanju Chen, Franklyn Wang, Clara Rodríguez-Núñez et al.PLDI 2023 · 24 citations
- ScaleCirc: Scaling the Analysis over Circom CircuitsJinan Jiang, Haoran Qin, Xiapu LuoASE 2025
- Language-Agnostic Detection of Computation-Constraint Inconsistencies in ZKP Programs Via Value InferenceArman Kolozyan, Bram Vandenbogaerde, Janwillem Swalens, Lode Hoste et al.S&P 2026 · 4 citations
- Practical Security Analysis of Zero-Knowledge Proof CircuitsHongbo Wen, Jon Stephens, Yanju Chen, Kostas Ferles et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 31 citations
