CMT-Benchmark: A Benchmark for Condensed Matter Theory Built by Expert Researchers
Haining Pan, James V. Roggeveen, Erez Berg, Juan Alvarez, Debanjan Chowdhury, Surya Ganguli, Federico Ghimenti, Juraj Hasik, Henry Hunt, Hong-Chen Jiang, Mason Kamb, Ying-Jer Kao
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in coding and mathematical problem-solving; however, evaluation on advanced research-level problems in the hard sciences remains scarce. To fill this gap, we present , a dataset of 50 original problems covering condensed matter theory (CMT) at the level of an expert researcher. The solution for these problems involve analytical and computational approaches commonly used in quantum many-body physics and classical statistical mechanics. The dataset has been designed and verified by a worldwide panel of expert researchers through a collaborative environment. Topics in the dataset include Hartree-Fock mean-field theory, exact diagonalization methods, quantum Monte Carlo sampling, density matrix renormalization group, quantum statistical mechanics, classical statistical mechanics, and model building. We evaluate different LLMs by programmatically checking LLM-generated solutions against expert-supplied ground truth. To verify LLMs performance at scale, we developed an automated machine-grading pipeline suitable for advanced physics research problems. For example, we handle non-commuting operators that are essential for quantum many-body problems by symbolic manipulation and normal ordering. Our evaluations show that frontier models struggle with all of the problems in the dataset, highlighting a gap in the physical reasoning skills of current LLMs. Notably, experts identified strategies for creating increasingly difficult problems by interacting with the LLMs and exploiting common failure modes. While the highest-performing model, GPT5, correctly solves 30% of the problems, average performance across 17 models (GPT, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, and Llama classes) is only 11.42.1%. Moreover, our benchmark contains 18 problems that not a single one of the 17 models considered here can correctly solve, and 26 problems that are solved by at most one model. These currently unsolvable problems span the fields of Quantum Monte Carlo, Variational Monte Carlo, and Density Matrix Renormalization Group. Furthermore, we illustrate how incorrect answers sometimes violate fundamental symmetries or have unphysical scaling dimensions. We believe that this benchmark set provides valuable guidance for the future development of language models, aiming to achieve the goal of AI research assistants and tutors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 069dc1ea-50d8-4bae-8fdc-e22f9435115bBuilds on2
- HARDMath: A Benchmark Dataset for Challenging Problems in Applied MathematicsJingxuan Fan, Sarah Martinson, Erik Y. Wang, Kaylie Hausknecht et al.ICLR 2025
- CURIE: Evaluating LLMs on Multitask Scientific Long-Context Understanding and ReasoningHao Cui, Zahra Shamsi, Gowoon Cheon, Xuejian Ma et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- CMPhysBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Condensed Matter PhysicsWeida Wang, Dongchen Huang, Jiatong Li, Tengchao Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
- UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language ModelsXin Xu, Qiyun Xu, Tong Xiao, Tianhao Chen et al.ICML 2025
- Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language ModelsDaman Arora, Himanshu Gaurav Singh, MausamEMNLP 2023 · 36 citations
- OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific ProblemsChaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu et al.ACL 2024 · 18 citations
