Mirror Descent Maximizes Generalized Margin and Can Be Implemented Efficiently
Haoyuan Sun, Kwangjun Ahn, Christos Thrampoulidis, Navid Azizan
Abstract
Driven by the empirical success and wide use of deep neural networks, understanding the generalization performance of overparameterized models has become an increasingly popular question. To this end, there has been substantial effort to characterize the implicit bias of the optimization algorithms used, such as gradient descent (GD), and the structural properties of their preferred solutions. This paper answers an open question in this literature: For the classification setting, what solution does mirror descent (MD) converge to? Specifically, motivated by its efficient implementation, we consider the family of mirror descent algorithms with potential function chosen as the -th power of the -norm, which is an important generalization of GD. We call this algorithm -. For this family, we characterize the solutions it obtains and show that it converges in direction to a generalized maximum-margin solution with respect to the -norm for linearly separable classification. While the MD update rule is in general expensive to compute and perhaps not suitable for deep learning, - is fully parallelizable in the same manner as SGD and can be used to train deep neural networks with virtually no additional computational overhead. Using comprehensive experiments with both linear and deep neural network models, we demonstrate that - can noticeably affect the structure and the generalization performance of the learned models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 067d2174-affd-4747-97e2-9600ccf55256Cited by top-tier papers10
- Implicit Optimization Bias of Next-token Prediction in Linear ModelsChristos ThrampoulidisNeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
- Implicit Bias of Mirror Flow on Separable DataScott Pesme, Radu-Alexandru Dragomir, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Achieving Margin Maximization Exponentially Fast via Progressive Norm RescalingMingze Wang, Zeping Min, Lei WuICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Never Saddle for Reparameterized Steepest Descent as Mirror FlowTom Jacobs, Chao Zhou, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Faster Margin Maximization Rates for Generic Optimization MethodsGuanghui Wang, Zihao Hu, Vidya Muthukumar, Jacob D. AbernethyNeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Zero-Shot Text-to-Image GenerationAditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray et al.ICML 2021 · 6,356 citations
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,108 citations
- Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural NetworksKaifeng Lyu, Jian LiICLR 2020 · 402 citations
Related papers
- Implicit Bias of Spectal Descent and Muon on Multiclass Separable DataChen Fan, Mark Schmidt, Christos ThrampoulidisNeurIPS 2025
- Implicit Bias of (Stochastic) Gradient Descent for Rank-1 Linear Neural NetworkBochen Lyu, Zhanxing ZhuNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- The Implicit Bias for Adaptive Optimization Algorithms on Homogeneous Neural NetworksBohan Wang, Qi Meng, Wei Chen, Tie-Yan LiuICML 2021 · 45 citations
- Does Momentum Change the Implicit Regularization on Separable Data?Bohan Wang, Qi Meng, Huishuai Zhang, Ruoyu Sun et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
- Flavors of Margin: Implicit Bias of Steepest Descent in Homogeneous Neural NetworksNikolaos Tsilivis, Gal Vardi, Julia KempeICLR 2025
