Handling the Selection Monad
Gordon D. Plotkin, Ningning Xie
Abstract
The selection monad on a set consists of selection functions. These select an element from the set, based on a loss (dually, reward) function giving the loss resulting from a choice of an element. Abadi and Plotkin used the monad to model a language with operations making choices of computations taking account of the loss that would arise from each choice. However, their choices were optimal, and they asked if they could instead be programmer provided. In this work, we present a novel design enabling programmers to do so. We present a version of algebraic effect handlers enriched by computational ideas inspired by the selection monad. Specifically, as well as the usual delimited continuations, our new kind of handlers additionally have access to choice continuations , that give the possible future losses. In this way programmers can write operations implementing optimisation algorithms that are aware of the losses arising from their possible choices. We give an operational semantics for a higher-order model language λC , and establish desirable properties including progress, type soundness, and termination for a subset with a mild hierarchical constraint on allowable operation types. We give this subset a selection monad denotational semantics, and prove soundness and adequacy results. We also present a Haskell implementation and give a variety of programming examples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0679f1b7-88ac-4753-a727-707e898ea0ecCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Interaction trees: representing recursive and impure programs in CoqLi-yao Xia, Yannick Zakowski, Paul He, Chung-Kil Hur et al.POPL 2020 · 133 citations
- Retrofitting effect handlers onto OCamlK. C. Sivaramakrishnan, Stephen Dolan, Leo White, Tom Kelly et al.PLDI 2021 · 56 citations
- A simple differentiable programming languageMartín Abadi, Gordon D. PlotkinPOPL 2020 · 49 citations
- Continuing WebAssembly with Effect HandlersLuna Phipps-Costin, Andreas Rossberg, Arjun Guha, Daan Leijen et al.OOPSLA 2023 · 20 citations
- High-level effect handlers in C++Dan R. Ghica, Sam Lindley, Marcos Maroñas Bravo, Maciej PirógOOPSLA 2022 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Smart Choices and the Selection MonadMartín Abadi, Gordon D. PlotkinLICS 2021 · 2 citations
- Handling Higher-Order Effectful Operations with Judgemental Monadic LawsZhixuan Yang, Nicolas WuPOPL 2026
- Hefty Algebras: Modular Elaboration of Higher-Order Algebraic EffectsCasper Bach Poulsen, Cas van der RestPOPL 2023 · 9 citations
- Answer Refinement Modification: Refinement Type System for Algebraic Effects and HandlersFuga Kawamata, Hiroshi Unno, Taro Sekiyama, Tachio TerauchiPOPL 2024 · 8 citations
- On Model-Checking Higher-Order Effectful ProgramsUgo Dal Lago, Alexis GhyselenPOPL 2024 · 10 citations
