Grokking Beyond the Euclidean Norm of Model Parameters
Pascal Tikeng Notsawo Jr., Guillaume Dumas, Guillaume Rabusseau
Abstract
Grokking refers to a delayed generalization following overfitting when optimizing artificial neural networks with gradient-based methods. In this work, we demonstrate that grokking can be induced by regularization, either explicit or implicit. More precisely, we show that when there exists a model with a property P (e.g., sparse or low-rank weights) that generalizes on the problem of interest, gradient descent with a small but non-zero regularization of P (e.g., ℓ 1 or nuclear norm regularization) results in grokking. This extends previous work showing that small nonzero weight decay induces grokking. Moreover, our analysis shows that over-parameterization by adding depth makes it possible to grok or ungrok without explicitly using regularization, which is impossible in shallow cases. We further show that the ℓ 2 norm is not a reliable proxy for generalization when the model is regularized toward a different property P , as the ℓ 2 norm grows in many cases where no weight decay is used, but the model generalizes anyway. We also show that grokking can be amplified solely through data selection, with any other hyperparameter fixed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0678e859-b5c2-4ee9-8513-19c84749e8a9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Intrinsic Task Symmetry Drives Generalization in Algorithmic TasksHyeonbin Hwang, Yeachan ParkICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Egalitarian Gradient Descent: A Simple Approach to Accelerated GrokkingAli Saheb Pasand, Elvis DohmatobICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Grokking Finite-Dimensional AlgebraPascal Jr Tikeng Notsawo, Guillaume Dumas, Guillaume RabusseauICML 2026
Builds on26
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational LimitBoaz Barak, Benjamin L. Edelman, Surbhi Goel, Sham M. Kakade et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 220 citations
- Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by NormsNoam Razin, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank LearningZhiyuan Li, Yuping Luo, Kaifeng LyuICLR 2021 · 155 citations
- A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering how Networks Learn Group OperationsBilal Chughtai, Lawrence Chan, Neel NandaICML 2023 · 144 citations
Related papers
- To Grok Grokking: Provable Grokking in Ridge RegressionMingyue Xu, Gal Vardi, Itay SafranICML 2026
- Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic DataZiming Liu, Eric J. Michaud, Max TegmarkICLR 2023 · 8 citations
- Why Do You Grok? A Theoretical Analysis on Grokking Modular AdditionMohamad Amin Mohamadi, Zhiyuan Li, Lei Wu, Danica J. SutherlandICML 2024
- On the Convergence Behavior of Preconditioned Gradient Descent Toward the Rich Learning RegimeShuai Jiang, Eric C. Cyr, Ben S. Southworth, Alexey VoroninICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- A Theoretical Framework for Grokking: Interpolation followed by Riemannian Norm MinimisationEtienne Boursier, Scott Pesme, Radu-Alexandru DragomirNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
