New hardness results for planar graph problems in p and an algorithm for sparsest cut
Amir Abboud, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Philip N. Klein
Abstract
The Sparsest Cut is a fundamental optimization problem that have been extensively studied. For planar inputs the problem is in P and can be solved in Õ(n 3 ) time if all vertex weights are 1. Despite a significant amount of effort, the best algorithms date back to the early 90’s and can only achieve O(log n)-approximation in Õ(n) time or 3.5-approximation in Õ(n 2 ) time [Rao, STOC92]. Our main result is an Ω(n 2−ε ) lower bound for Sparsest Cut even in planar graphs with unit vertex weights, under the (min, +)-Convolution conjecture, showing that approxima- tions are inevitable in the near-linear time regime. To complement the lower bound, we provide a 3.3-approximation in near-linear time, improving upon the 25-year old result of Rao in both time and accuracy. We also show that our lower bound is not far from optimal by observing an exact algorithm with running time Õ(n 5/2 ) improving upon the Õ(n 3 ) algorithm of Park and Phillips [STOC93]. Our lower bound accomplishes a repeatedly raised challenge by being the first fine-grained lower bound for a natural planar graph problem in P. Building on our construction we prove near-quadratic lower bounds under SETH for variants of the closest pair problem in planar graphs, and use them to show that the popular Average-Linkage procedure for Hierarchical Clustering cannot be simulated in truly subquadratic time. At the core of our constructions is a diamond-like gadget that also settles the complexity of Diameter in distributed planar networks. We prove an Ω(n/ log n) lower bound on the number of communication rounds required to compute the weighted diameter of a network in the CONGET model, even when the underlying graph is planar and all nodes are D = 4 hops away from each other. This is the first poly(n) lower bound in the planar-distributed setting, and it complements the recent poly(D, log n) upper bounds of Li and Parter [STOC 2019] for (exact) unweighted diameter and for (1 + ε) approximate weighted diameter.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 06583146-8667-495e-a83a-c2dd1ab4e02aCited by top-tier papers3
- Breaking the Cubic Barrier for All-Pairs Max-Flow: Gomory-Hu Tree in Nearly Quadratic TimeAmir Abboud, Robert Krauthgamer, Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi et al.FOCS 2022 · 16 citations
- A quasipolynomial (2 + ε)-approximation for planar sparsest cutVincent Cohen-Addad, Anupam Gupta, Philip N. Klein, Jason LiSTOC 2021 · 4 citations
- Planar Negative k-CyclePawel Gawrychowski, Shay Mozes, Oren WeimannSODA 2021 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Distributed weighted min-cut in nearly-optimal timeMichal Dory, Yuval Efron, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon NanongkaiSTOC 2021 · 2 citations
- Embeddings of Planar Quasimetrics into Directed ℓ1 and Polylogarithmic Approximation for Directed Sparsest-CutKen-ichi Kawarabayashi, Anastasios SidiropoulosFOCS 2021 · 4 citations
- Settling SETH vs. approximate sparse directed unweighted diameter (up to (NU)NSETH)Ray LiSTOC 2021 · 5 citations
- Deterministic Low-Diameter Decompositions for Weighted Graphs and Distributed and Parallel ApplicationsVáclav Rozhon, Michael Elkin, Christoph Grunau, Bernhard HaeuplerFOCS 2022 · 5 citations
- Almost-linear ε-emulators for planar graphsHsien-Chih Chang, Robert Krauthgamer, Zihan TanSTOC 2022 · 2 citations
