ACL Findings2024
Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translation
Xu Huang, Zhirui Zhang, Xiang Geng, Yichao Du, Jiajun Chen, Shujian Huang
Abstract
This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) leverage source and reference data in machine translation evaluation task, aiming to better understand the mechanisms behind their remarkable performance in this task. We design the controlled experiments across various input modes and model types, and employ both coarse-grained and fine-grained prompts to discern the utility of source versus reference information. We find that reference information significantly enhances the evaluation accuracy, while surprisingly, source information sometimes is counterproductive, indicating LLMs' inability to fully leverage the cross-lingual capability when evaluating translations. Further analysis of the fine-grained evaluation and finetuning experiments show similar results. These findings also suggest a potential research direction for LLMs that fully exploits the crosslingual capability of LLMs to achieve better performance in machine translation evaluation tasks.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Are Large Reasoning Models Good Translation Evaluators? Analysis and Performance BoostRunzhe Zhan, Zhihong Huang, Xinyi Yang, Lidia S. Chao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- MMTIT-Bench: A Multilingual and Multi-Scenario Benchmark with Cognition-Perception-Reasoning Guided Text-Image Machine TranslationGengluo Li, Chengquan Zhang, Yupu Liang, Huawen Shen et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation?Shenbin Qian, Archchana Sindhujan, Minnie Kabra, Diptesh Kanojia et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Quantifying the Impact of Translation Errors on Multilingual LLM EvaluationKlaudia Thellmann, Bernhard Stadler, Michael Färber, Jens LehmannACL 2026
Builds on10
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
- The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand"Peter West, Ximing Lu, Nouha Dziri, Faeze Brahman et al.ICLR 2024 · 116 citations
- BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text GenerationThibault Sellam, Dipanjan Das, Ankur P. ParikhACL 2020 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Augmenting Large Language Model Translators via Translation MemoriesYongyu Mu, Abudurexiti Reheman, Zhiquan Cao, Yuchun Fan et al.ACL Findings 2023 · 11 citations
- Exploring Context Strategies in LLMs for Discourse-Aware Machine TranslationRitvik Choudhary, Rem Hida, Masaki Hamada, Hayato Futami et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- Towards Multiple References Era - Addressing Data Leakage and Limited Reference Diversity in Machine Translation EvaluationXianfeng Zeng, Yijin Liu, Fandong Meng, Jie ZhouACL Findings 2024 · 2 citations
- DMDTEval: An Evaluation and Analysis of LLMs on Disambiguation in Multi-domain TranslationZhibo Man, Yuanmeng Chen, Yujie Zhang, Jinan XuEMNLP 2025
- Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMsYafu Li, Ronghao Zhang, Zhilin Wang, Huajian Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
