Truss Decomposition Under Edge Local Differential Privacy
Yuting Zhang, Wei Ni, Kai Wang, Yizhang He, Conggai Li
Abstract
k-truss is a widely studied cohesive sub graph model that has gained significant attention over the past decades. Truss decomposition, a fundamental task in graph analysis, aims to compute the largest k for which an edge belongs to a k-truss. However, directly performing truss decomposition on sensitive graphs risks exposing the private information of user connections in real-world applications. Edge local differential privacy (edge LDP) is extensively used to protect the privacy of edges in graph analysis. This paper, for the first time, addresses the problem of truss decomposition under edge LDP. A naive approach allows each vertex to perturb its neighbor list locally and generate a noisy graph for truss decomposition. However, it often produces excessive truss number estimations, since the noisy graph is generally much denser and fails to preserve the input graph structure. To obtain more accurate estimates, we propose the Local algorithm that leverages the local information during the truss decomposition process. Furthermore, to avoid adding substantial noise to truss numbers to satisfy edge LDP, we introduce the Global algorithm that optimizes the noise scale of support numbers, enhancing the accuracy of truss decom-position results. We further propose the Global * algorithm that eliminates the need for vertices to download noisy edges by utilizing noisy degrees to adjust support numbers during truss decomposition, achieving high accuracy with significantly lower communication costs. Extensive experiments on 9 real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 05d91cab-d09d-4bb8-ad40-f5ae9f3e0b03Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Robust Privacy-Preserving Triangle Counting under Edge Local Differential PrivacyYizhang He, Kai Wang, Wenjie Zhang, Xuemin Lin et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 5 citations
- Differential Privacy from Locally Adjustable Graph Algorithms: k-Core Decomposition, Low Out-Degree Ordering, and Densest SubgraphsLaxman Dhulipala, Quanquan C. Liu, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Jessica Shi et al.FOCS 2022 · 24 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 139 citations
- Practical and Accurate Local Edge Differentially Private Graph AlgorithmsPranay Mundra, Charalampos Papamanthou, Julian Shun, Quanquan C. LiuVLDB 2025 · 3 citations
- Efficient -Truss Breaking and MinimizationRuicheng Zhu, Xintong Wang, Kai Wang, Fan Zhang et al.ICDE 2025
