An Efficient and Exact Algorithm for Locally h-Clique Densest Subgraph Discovery
Xiaojia Xu, Haoyu Liu, Xiaowei Lv, Yongcai Wang, Deying Li
Abstract
Detecting locally, non-overlapping, near-clique densest subgraphs is a crucial problem for community search in social networks. As a vertex may be involved in multiple overlapped local cliques, detecting locally densest sub-structures considering h -clique density, i.e., locally h-clique densest subgraph (LhCDS) attracts great interests. This paper investigates the L h CDS detection problem and proposes an efficient and exact algorithm to list the top- k non-overlapping, locally h -clique dense, and compact subgraphs. We in particular jointly consider h -clique compact number and L h CDS and design a new ''Iterative Propose-Prune-and-Verify'' pipeline (IPPV) for top- k L h CDS detection. (1) In the proposal part, we derive initial bounds for h -clique compact numbers; prove the validity, and extend a convex programming method to tighten the bounds for proposing L h CDS candidates without missing any. (2) Then a tentative graph decomposition method is proposed to solve the challenging case where a clique spans multiple subgraphs in graph decomposition. (3) To deal with the verification difficulty, both a basic and a fast verification method are proposed, where the fast method constructs a smaller-scale flow network to improve efficiency while preserving the verification correctness. The verified L h CDSes are returned, while the candidates that remained unsure reenter the IPPV pipeline. (4) We further extend the proposed methods to locally more general pattern densest subgraph detection problems. We prove the exactness and low complexity of the proposed algorithm. Extensive experiments on real datasets show the effectiveness and high efficiency of IPPV. Codes are available at: https://github.com/Elssky/IPPV
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- KClist++: A Simple Algorithm for Finding k-Clique Densest Subgraphs in Large GraphsBintao Sun, Maximilien Danisch, T.-H. Hubert Chan, Mauro SozioVLDB 2020 · 54 citations
- Faster and Scalable Algorithms for Densest Subgraph and DecompositionElfarouk Harb, Kent Quanrud, Chandra ChekuriNeurIPS 2022 · 48 citations
- Densest Subgraph: Supermodularity, Iterative Peeling, and FlowChandra Chekuri, Kent Quanrud, Manuel R. TorresSODA 2022 · 34 citations
- Finding Locally Densest Subgraphs: A Convex Programming ApproachChenhao Ma, Reynold Cheng, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan, Xiaolin HanVLDB 2022 · 29 citations
- Discovering Polarization Niches via Dense Subgraphs with Attractors and RepulsersAdriano Fazzone, Tommaso Lanciano, Riccardo Denni, Charalampos E. Tsourakakis et al.VLDB 2022 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Verification-Free Approaches to Efficient Locally Densest Subgraph DiscoveryTran Ba Trung, Lijun Chang, Tien Long Nguyen, Kai Yao et al.ICDE 2023 · 6 citations
- A Counting-based Approach for Efficient k-Clique Densest Subgraph DiscoveryYingli Zhou, Qingshuo Guo, Yixiang Fang, Chenhao MaSIGMOD 2024 · 10 citations
- Optimal Quasi-clique: Hardness, Equivalence with Densest-k-Subgraph, and Quasi-partitioned Community MiningAritra Konar, Nicholas D. SidiropoulosAAAI 2024 · 6 citations
- Efficient 푘-Clique Densest Subgraph Discovery: Towards Bridging Practice and TheoryYingli Zhou, Qingshuo Guo, Yixiang FangVLDB 2025 · 2 citations
- Bound-Tightened Densest Subgraph Discovery on GPUWajid Manzoor, Ke Fan, Muhammad Shaheer, Guimu GuoSIGMOD 2026
