FlowMAP: Flow Matching for Generalizable Agent Planning
Jiarun Fu, Lizhong Ding, Ye Yuan, Qiuning Wei, Zhaohuan Linghu, Yurong Cheng, Changsheng Li, Tianlong Gu, Liang Chang, Guoren Wang
Abstract
Agent planning faces dynamic heterogeneity—nonstationary observations, dynamics, and objectives with sparse, delayed rewards—which dominant methods largely ignore, leading to poor generalization under environment shifts. We propose Flow-Matching for Agent Planning (FlowMAP), which formulates planning as a continuous-time flow-matching problem by learning a planning-time velocity field that transports an initial meta-state distribution toward a task-conditioned target. FlowMAP introduces Value-Transport Flow Matching to provide a distribution-level planning objective that steers transport toward high-value regions in the meta-state distribution, mitigating error accumulation under environmental shifts. To enforce alignment between meta-state distribution transport and action--environment interaction, FlowMAP further proposes Flow--Policy Co-Training, which jointly optimizes the planning flow and policy so that the flow transport directly regularizes the policy-induced meta-distribution dynamics. Across diverse agent planning benchmarks, FlowMAP consistently outperforms strong baselines, yielding improvements in planning generalization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 05cd6d74-ff3e-4499-adca-5541c6d97b36Builds on35
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate GenerationEmmanuel Bengio, Moksh Jain, Maksym Korablyov, Doina Precup et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 565 citations
- On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models - A Critical InvestigationKarthik Valmeekam, Matthew Marquez, Sarath Sreedharan, Subbarao KambhampatiNeurIPS 2023 · 509 citations
- Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive RepresentationsMax Schwarzer, Ankesh Anand, Rishab Goel, R. Devon Hjelm et al.ICLR 2021 · 399 citations
Related papers
- What Does Flow-Matching Bring to TD-Learning?Bhavya Agrawalla, Michal Nauman, Aviral KumarICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Masked Skill Token Training for Hierarchical Off-Dynamics TransferZeyu Feng, Haiyan Yin, Yew-Soon Ong, Harold SohICLR 2026
- OMPO: A Unified Framework for RL under Policy and Dynamics ShiftsYu Luo, Tianying Ji, Fuchun Sun, Jianwei Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Direct Flow Q-LearningShicheng Cao, Jingrui Jia, Wenyu Li, Feng Duan et al.ICML 2026
- Plan Your Target and Learn Your Skills: Transferable State-Only Imitation Learning via Decoupled Policy OptimizationMinghuan Liu, Zhengbang Zhu, Yuzheng Zhuang, Weinan Zhang et al.ICML 2022 · 13 citations
