xCOMET-lite: Bridging the Gap Between Efficiency and Quality in Learned MT Evaluation Metrics
Daniil Larionov, Mikhail Seleznyov, Vasiliy Viskov, Alexander Panchenko, Steffen Eger
Abstract
State-of-the-art trainable machine translation evaluation metrics like xCOMET achieve high correlation with human judgment but rely on large encoders (up to 10.7B parameters), making them computationally expensive and inaccessible to researchers with limited resources. To address this issue, we investigate whether the knowledge stored in these large encoders can be compressed while maintaining quality. We employ distillation, quantization, and pruning techniques to create efficient xCOMET alternatives and introduce a novel data collection pipeline for efficient black-box distillation. Our experiments show that, using quantization, xCOMET can be compressed up to three times with no quality degradation. Additionally, through distillation, we create an 278M-sized xCOMET-lite metric, which has only 2.6% of xCOMET-XXL parameters, but retains 92.1% of its quality. Besides, it surpasses strong small-scale metrics like COMET-22 and BLEURT-20 on the WMT22 metrics challenge dataset by 6.4%, despite using 50% fewer parameters. All code, dataset, and models are available online.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 05bf7470-a2cf-49c7-9b52-b16fe05c8e95Builds on17
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine TranslationHaoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan et al.ICML 2024 · 447 citations
Related papers
- Weight Distillation: Transferring the Knowledge in Neural Network ParametersYe Lin, Yanyang Li, Ziyang Wang, Bei Li et al.ACL 2021
- DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for TranslationMarzena Karpinska, Nishant Raj, Katherine Thai, Yixiao Song et al.EMNLP 2022 · 18 citations
- Are Large Reasoning Models Good Translation Evaluators? Analysis and Performance BoostRunzhe Zhan, Zhihong Huang, Xinyi Yang, Lidia S. Chao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- IndicMT Eval: A Dataset to Meta-Evaluate Machine Translation Metrics for Indian LanguagesAnanya B. Sai, Tanay Dixit, Vignesh Nagarajan, Anoop Kunchukuttan et al.ACL 2023 · 8 citations
- Disentangling Uncertainty in Machine Translation EvaluationChrysoula Zerva, Taisiya Glushkova, Ricardo Rei, André F. T. MartinsEMNLP 2022 · 6 citations
