Improving Zero-Shot Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning using Generalized Similarity Functions
Bogdan Mazoure, Ilya Kostrikov, Ofir Nachum, Jonathan Tompson
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) agents are widely used for solving complex sequential decision making tasks, but still exhibit difficulty in generalizing to scenarios not seen during training. While prior online approaches demonstrated that using additional signals beyond the reward function can lead to better generalization capabilities in RL agents, i.e. using self-supervised learning (SSL), they struggle in the offline RL setting, i.e. learning from a static dataset. We show that performance of online algorithms for generalization in RL can be hindered in the offline setting due to poor estimation of similarity between observations. We propose a new theoretically-motivated framework called Generalized Similarity Functions (GSF), which uses contrastive learning to train an offline RL agent to aggregate observations based on the similarity of their expected future behavior, where we quantify this similarity using generalized value functions. We show that GSF is general enough to recover existing SSL objectives while also improving zero-shot generalization performance on a complex offline RL benchmark, offline Procgen.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0513c8bc-eba0-4b75-bbbb-c9c2e93c80caCited by top-tier papers10
- Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- On the Importance of Exploration for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningYiding Jiang, J. Zico Kolter, Roberta RaileanuNeurIPS 2023 · 48 citations
- What is Essential for Unseen Goal Generalization of Offline Goal-conditioned RL?Rui Yang, Lin Yong, Xiaoteng Ma, Hao Hu et al.ICML 2023 · 35 citations
- Semi-Supervised Offline Reinforcement Learning with Action-Free TrajectoriesQinqing Zheng, Mikael Henaff, Brandon Amos, Aditya GroverICML 2023 · 29 citations
- The Generalization Gap in Offline Reinforcement LearningIshita Mediratta, Qingfei You, Minqi Jiang, Roberta RaileanuICLR 2024 · 24 citations
Builds on30
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster AssignmentsMathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,249 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement LearningMichael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 1,261 citations
- Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from PixelsDenis Yarats, Ilya Kostrikov, Rob FergusICLR 2021 · 911 citations
Related papers
- Improving Zero-Shot Offline RL via Behavioral Task SamplingNazim Bendib, Nicolas Perrin-Gilbert, Olivier SigaudICML 2026
- From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement LearningJun-Jie Yang, Chia-Heng Hsu, Kui-Yuan Chen, Ping-Chun HsiehICML 2026
- Preference-based Policy Optimization from Sparse-reward Offline DatasetWenjie Qiu, Guofeng Cui, Shicheng Liu, Yuanlin Duan et al.ICLR 2026
- Provable Zero-Shot Generalization in Offline Reinforcement LearningZhiyong Wang, Chen Yang, John C. S. Lui, Dongruo ZhouICML 2025
- Cross-Trajectory Representation Learning for Zero-Shot Generalization in RLBogdan Mazoure, Ahmed M. Ahmed, R. Devon Hjelm, Andrey Kolobov et al.ICLR 2022 · 30 citations
