4D-RGPT: Toward Region-level 4D Understanding via Perceptual Distillation
Chiao-An Yang, Ryo Hachiuma, Sifei Liu, Subhashree Radhakrishnan, Raymond A. Yeh, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Min-Hung Chen
Abstract
Despite advances in Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), their ability to reason over 3D structures and temporal dynamics remains limited, constrained by weak 4D perception and temporal understanding. Existing 3D and 4D Video Question Answering (VQA) benchmarks also emphasize static scenes and lack region-level prompting. We tackle these issues by introducing: (a) 4D-RGPT, a specialized MLLM designed to capture 4D representations from video inputs with enhanced temporal perception; (b) Perceptual 4D Distillation (P4D), a training framework that transfers 4D representations from a frozen expert model into 4D-RGPT for comprehensive 4D perception; and (c) R4D-Bench, a benchmark for depth-aware dynamic scenes with region-level prompting, built via a hybrid automated and human-verified pipeline. Our 4D-RGPT achieves notable improvements on both existing 4D VQA benchmarks and the proposed R4D-Bench benchmark. Links: Project Page | GitHub | Dataset (a) Baseline R4D-Bench (b) Ours Ans: I am not sure.
0 2 12 ⟨R1⟩ Q: What is the average speed of ⟨R1⟩? Frame 1 Frame 2 Frame N () () Ans: 7.0 m/s Region (2D): Where is ⟨R1⟩? Depth (3D): How far away is ⟨R1⟩? Time (4D): When does ⟨R1⟩ move? Track ⟨R1⟩ across frames Depth Perception Temporal Perception Figure 1 | Overview of Region-level 4D Understanding. 4D region-level VQA, e.g., our R4D-Bench, requires MLLMs to be able to track regions (2D), perceive depth (3D), and temporal progression (4D).
Baseline MLLMs cannot recognize one or more of these aspects and thus fail to answer questions correctly. With our distillation framework, our 4D-RGPT better perceives these aspects and answers accurately. We note that the regions labeled with (*) are not provided in R4D-Bench; they are visualized for readability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0508751a-395f-4010-8545-d7e0000453c3Builds on43
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- Vision Transformers for Dense PredictionRené Ranftl, Alexey Bochkovskiy, Vladlen KoltunICCV 2021 · 2,647 citations
Related papers
- 4D-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Modal Large Language Models for 4D Object UnderstandingWenxuan Zhu, Bing Li, Cheng Zheng, Jinjie Mai et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- 4DP-QA: Scalable QA for 4D Perception in Vision Language ModelsSeokju Cho, Abhishek Badki, Hang Su, Jindong Jiang et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language ModelsShijie Zhou, Alexander Vilesov, Xuehai He, Ziyu Wan et al.ICCV 2025 · 9 citations
- Thinking in Dynamics: How Multimodal Large Language Models Perceive, Track, and Reason Dynamics in Physical 4D WorldYuzhi Huang, Kairun Wen, Rongxin Gao, Dongxuan Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 15 citations
- Vid-LLM: A Compact Video-based 3D Multimodal LLM with Reconstruction-Reasoning SynergyHaijier Chen, Bo Xu, Shoujian Zhang, Haoze Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
