Assertiveness-based Agent Communication for a Personalized Medicine on Medical Imaging Diagnosis
Francisco Maria Calisto, João Gabriel de Matos Fernandes, Margarida Morais, Carlos Santiago, João Maria Veigas Abrantes, Nuno Jardim Nunes, Jacinto C. Nascimento
Abstract
Intelligent agents are showing increasing promise for clinical decision-making in a variety of healthcare settings. While a substantial body of work has contributed to the best strategies to convey these agents’ decisions to clinicians, few have considered the impact of personalizing and customizing these communications on the clinicians’ performance and receptiveness. This raises the question of how intelligent agents should adapt their tone in accordance with their target audience. We designed two approaches to communicate the decisions of an intelligent agent for breast cancer diagnosis with different tones: a suggestive (non-assertive) tone and an imposing (assertive) one. We used an intelligent agent to inform about: (1) number of detected findings; (2) cancer severity on each breast and per medical imaging modality; (3) visual scale representing severity estimates; (4) the sensitivity and specificity of the agent; and (5) clinical arguments of the patient, such as pathological co-variables. Our results demonstrate that assertiveness plays an important role in how this communication is perceived and its benefits. We show that personalizing assertiveness according to the professional experience of each clinician can reduce medical errors and increase satisfaction, bringing a novel perspective to the design of adaptive communication between intelligent agents and clinicians.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 04a18a36-c2d2-4b47-a95c-e3345a4c8a3bCited by top-tier papers16
- Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for RadiologyNur Yildirim, Hannah Richardson, Maria Teodora Wetscherek, Junaid Bajwa et al.CHI 2024 · 81 citations
- The Impact of Imperfect XAI on Human-AI Decision-MakingKatelyn Morrison, Philipp Spitzer, Violet Turri, Michelle Feng et al.CSCW 2024 · 60 citations
- AI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online DebatesJarod Govers, Eduardo Velloso, Vassilis Kostakos, Jorge GonçalvesCHI 2024 · 34 citations
- Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial ExplanationsSander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, Niels van BerkelCSCW 2025 · 32 citations
- Leveraging Historical Medical Records as a Proxy via Multimodal Modeling and Visualization to Enrich Medical Diagnostic LearningYang Ouyang, Yuchen Wu, He Wang, Chenyang Zhang et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-MakingAyano Okoso, Mingzhe Yang, Yukino BabaCHI 2025 · 18 citations
- A Virtual Counselor for Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling: Adaptive Pedagogy Leads to Greater Knowledge GainShuo Zhou, Timothy W. BickmoreCHI 2022 · 19 citations
- Who is Trusted for a Second Opinion? Comparing Collective Advice from a Medical AI and Physicians in Biopsy Decisions After Mammography ScreeningHenrik H. J. Detjen, Lars Densky, Niklas von Kalckreuth, Marvin KopkaCHI 2025 · 12 citations
- Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health CareVenkatesh Sivaraman, Leigh A. Bukowski, Joel Levin, Jeremy M. Kahn et al.CHI 2023 · 126 citations
- Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer PatientsYuexing Hao, Zeyu Liu, Robert N. Riter, Saleh KalantariCHI 2024 · 35 citations
