Decision-Focused Learning with Directional Gradients
Michael Huang, Vishal Gupta
Abstract
We propose a novel family of decision-aware surrogate losses, called Perturbation Gradient (PG) losses, for the predict-then-optimize framework. The key idea is to connect the expected downstream decision loss with the directional derivative of a particular plug-in objective, and then approximate this derivative using zeroth order gradient techniques. Unlike the original decision loss which is typically piecewise constant and discontinuous, our new PG losses is a Lipschitz continuous, difference of concave functions that can be optimized using off-the-shelf gradient-based methods. Most importantly, unlike existing surrogate losses, the approximation error of our PG losses vanishes as the number of samples grows. Hence, optimizing our surrogate loss yields a best-in-class policy asymptotically, even in misspecified settings. This is the first such result in misspecified settings, and we provide numerical evidence confirming our PG losses substantively outperform existing proposals when the underlying model is misspecified.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 046eb402-3561-4353-b68e-5fc26a13de48Cited by top-tier papers4
- Online Decision-Focused LearningAymeric Capitaine, Maxime Haddouche, Eric Moulines, Michael I. Jordan et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- A Solver-Free Training Method for Predict-then-OptimizeBeichen Wan, Mo LiuICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Contextual Optimization Under Model Misspecification: A Tractable and Generalizable ApproachOmar Bennouna, Jiawei Zhang, Saurabh Amin, Asuman E. OzdaglarICML 2025
- Decision-aware Training of Spatiotemporal Forecasting Models to Select a Top-K Subset of Sites for InterventionKyle Heuton, F. Samuel Muench, Shikhar Shrestha, Thomas J. Stopka et al.ICML 2025
Builds on8
- Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial SolversMarin Vlastelica Pogancic, Anselm Paulus, Vít Musil, Georg Martius et al.ICLR 2020 · 341 citations
- Learning with Differentiable Pertubed OptimizersQuentin Berthet, Mathieu Blondel, Olivier Teboul, Marco Cuturi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 181 citations
- Risk Bounds and Calibration for a Smart Predict-then-Optimize MethodHeyuan Liu, Paul GrigasNeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
- Landscape Surrogate: Learning Decision Losses for Mathematical Optimization Under Partial InformationArman Zharmagambetov, Brandon Amos, Aaron M. Ferber, Taoan Huang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- An Exact Symbolic Reduction of Linear Smart Predict+Optimize to Mixed Integer Linear ProgrammingJihwan Jeong, Parth Jaggi, Andrew Butler, Scott SannerICML 2022 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Leaving the Nest: Going beyond Local Loss Functions for Predict-Then-OptimizeSanket Shah, Bryan Wilder, Andrew Perrault, Milind TambeAAAI 2024 · 22 citations
- Learning MDPs from Features: Predict-Then-Optimize for Sequential Decision Making by Reinforcement LearningKai Wang, Sanket Shah, Haipeng Chen, Andrew Perrault et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 44 citations
- A Closer Look at Deep Policy GradientsAndrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras et al.ICLR 2020 · 107 citations
- Plug-in Performative OptimizationLicong Lin, Tijana ZrnicICML 2024 · 21 citations
- Decision-Focused Learning without Decision-Making: Learning Locally Optimized Decision LossesSanket Shah, Kai Wang, Bryan Wilder, Andrew Perrault et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
