Diff-PIC: Revolutionizing Particle-In-Cell Nuclear Fusion Simulation with Diffusion Models
Chuan Liu, Chunshu Wu, Shihui Cao, Mingkai Chen, James Chenhao Liang, Ang Li, Michael Huang, Chuang Ren, Ying Nian Wu, Dongfang Liu, Tong Geng
Abstract
The rapid development of AI highlights the pressing need for sustainable energy, a critical global challenge for decades. Nuclear fusion, generally seen as an ultimate solution, has been the focus of intensive research for nearly a century, with investments reaching hundreds of billions of dollars. Recent advancements in Inertial Confinement Fusion have drawn significant attention to fusion research, in which Laser-Plasma Interaction (LPI) is critical for ensuring fusion stability and efficiency. However, the complexity of LPI upon fusion ignition makes analytical approaches impractical, leaving researchers depending on extremely computation-demanding Particle-in-Cell (PIC) simulations to generate data, presenting a significant bottleneck to advancing fusion research. In response, this work introduces Diff-PIC, a novel framework that leverages conditional diffusion models as a computationally efficient alternative to PIC simulations for generating high-fidelity scientific LPI data. In this work, physical patterns captured by PIC simulations are distilled into diffusion models associated with two tailored enhancements: (1) To effectively capture the complex relationships between physical parameters and corresponding outcomes, the parameters are encoded in a physically-informed manner. (2) To further enhance efficiency while maintaining high fidelity and physical validity, the rectified flow technique is employed to transform our model into a one-step conditional diffusion model. Experimental results show that Diff-PIC achieves 16,200 speedup compared to traditional PIC on a 100 picosecond simulation, with an average reduction in MAE / RMSE / FID of 59.21% / 57.15% / 39.46% with respect to two other SOTA data generation approaches.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on10
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image SynthesisPatrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari et al.ICML 2024 · 3,620 citations
- Consistency ModelsYang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, Ilya SutskeverICML 2023 · 1,720 citations
- Your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like oneWill Grathwohl, Kuan-Chieh Wang, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2020 · 643 citations
Related papers
- Order within Chaos: Capturing Intrinsic Energy Anomalies for AI-Manipulated Image Forgery LocalizationYiming Wang, Baiqi Wu, Qingming Li, Jiahao Chen et al.ICML 2026
- Accelerating Diffusion via Hybrid Data-Pipeline Parallelism Based on Conditional Guidance SchedulingEuisoo Jung, Byunghyun Kim, Hyunjin Kim, Seonghye Cho et al.CVPR 2026
- Personalized Federated Training of Diffusion Models with Privacy GuaranteesKumar Kshitij Patel, Bingqing Jiang, A. F. M. Mahfuzul Kabir, Weitong Zhang et al.CVPR 2026
- GeoDiffusion: Text-Prompted Geometric Control for Object Detection Data GenerationKai Chen, Enze Xie, Zhe Chen, Yibo Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 60 citations
- DiffPCI: Large Motion Point Cloud Frame Interpolation with Diffusion ModelTianyu Zhang, Haobo Jiang, Jian Yang, Jin XieICCV 2025 · 1 citation
