Towards Adversarial Robustness via Debiased High-Confidence Logit Alignment
Kejia Zhang, Juanjuan Weng, Shaozi Li, Zhiming Luo
Abstract
Despite the remarkable progress of deep neural networks (DNNs) in various visual tasks, their vulnerability to adversarial examples raises significant security concerns. Recent adversarial training methods leverage inverse adversarial attacks to generate high-confidence examples, aiming to align adversarial distributions with high-confidence class regions. However, our investigation reveals that under inverse adversarial attacks, high-confidence outputs are influenced by biased feature activations, causing models to rely on background features that lack a causal relationship with the labels. This spurious correlation bias leads to overfitting irrelevant background features during adversarial training, thereby degrading the model's robust performance and generalization capabilities. To address this issue, we propose Debiased High-Confidence Adversarial Training (DHAT), a novel approach that aligns adversarial logits with debiased high-confidence logits and restores proper attention by enhancing foreground logit orthogonality. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DHAT achieves state-of-the-art robustness on both CIFAR and ImageNet-1K benchmarks, while significantly improving generalization by mitigating the feature bias inherent in inverse adversarial training approaches. Code is available at https: //github.com/KejiaZhang-Robust/DHAT. Table 6. Transfer attack accuracy (%) in the single-model transfer scenario. The number in bold indicates the best accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 041ffc9e-0d06-4a65-bdea-ae674aeba58bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on30
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
Related papers
- The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend: Exploring Inverse Adversaries for Improving Adversarial TrainingJunhao Dong, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Jianhuang Lai, Xiaohua XieCVPR 2023
- On the Connection between Invariant Learning and Adversarial Training for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationShiji Xin, Yifei Wang, Jingtong Su, Yisen WangAAAI 2023 · 14 citations
- Reducing Excessive Margin to Achieve a Better Accuracy vs. Robustness Trade-offRahul Rade, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-DezfooliICLR 2022 · 166 citations
- Improving the Transferability of Adversarial Samples With Adversarial TransformationsWeibin Wu, Yuxin Su, Michael R. Lyu, Irwin KingCVPR 2021
- Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional RobustnessMazda Moayeri, Kiarash Banihashem, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
